Solving Impulse: Why Only 1 Method Works for Determining Change in Velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball of mass 0.150 kg dropped from a height of 1.25 m, which rebounds to a height of 0.960 m. Participants are discussing the impulse imparted to the ball by the floor and the methods used to determine the change in velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of conservation of energy versus kinematic equations to find the change in velocity. There is a discussion about why the conservation of energy approach seems inadequate in this context.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the limitations of using conservation of mechanical energy in collision scenarios, noting that energy is converted to thermal energy during the impact. Others suggest that combining kinematics with conservation principles may be necessary for a comprehensive understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that mechanical energy is not conserved in this collision due to energy losses, and there is an emphasis on the importance of considering time in the problem-solving approach.

Nito
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nvm, there's no kinetic energy when it reaches its peak height. stupid lol!
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Because mechanical energy is not conserved in this collision. Part of the mechanical energy is converted to thermal energy (heat) in the collision, with the temperature of the ball and the temperature of the ground increasing slightly.
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Like chester said, the ball started off with a certain amount of potential energy mg(1.25) and then ended with mg(0.96). So you would have appeared to "lose" energy.

Often if time is involved in a problem, it will be difficult to use the conservation of mechanical energy alone to solve that problem. If you can use kinematics, cons. of E, and cons. of momentum, you are good on a significant number of mechanics problems. And being able to draw free body diagrams...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K