Solving Integral: \int \frac {x+4}{x^2+2x+5}

  • Thread starter Thread starter laker88116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
To solve the integral ∫ (x+4)/(x²+2x+5) dx, it is effective to split the fraction into two parts: one that can be integrated as the natural logarithm and another that leads to an arctangent function. First, the derivative of the denominator, 2x + 2, is used to adjust the numerator. This allows the integral to be expressed as a combination of simpler integrals, one of which is straightforwardly integrated to yield the logarithm of the denominator. The remaining part can be simplified using the method of completing the square, leading to an arctangent result. Understanding these techniques is crucial for tackling integrals of this form effectively.
laker88116
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
\int \frac {x+4}{x^2+2x+5}

I have no idea where to start on this. I can't see any substitutions that would work. I tried completing the square. I also tried to split up the fraction. It isn't getting any simpler. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integrals of this type can always be split into an "ln-part" and an "arctan-part".

First, calculate the derivative of the denominator and adjust your nominator to get this and split the rest.

\left( {x^2 + 2x + 5} \right)^\prime = 2x + 2

The integral then becomes

\int {\frac{{x + 4}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx = \frac{1}{2}\int {\frac{{2x + 2 + 6}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx = \frac{1}{2}\int {\frac{{2x + 2}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx + 3\int {\frac{{dx}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}}

Now the first integral simply becomes the ln of the denominator, because that's how we 'made' it, it's now of the form f'(x)/f(x).
The second one no longer has an x in the nominator and you can complete a square in the denominator to get an arctan.
 
I understand that and it makes sense. I just don't get how you determine that's what you do.
 
Well, this is a standard way for these integrals.
When the degree of the nominator isn't lower that the one of the denominator, you can divide first (euclidean division on the polynomials) to get this case again.
 
Alright, I think I got this better now. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top