Solving Irreversible Processes: Q-W=U2-U1

AI Thread Summary
An isentropic process can be irreversible if it maintains constant entropy while increasing the universe's entropy, leading to energy loss. Desiring less irreversible processes is linked to achieving higher efficiency, as irreversible processes waste energy through entropy increase. The first law of thermodynamics applies to both reversible and irreversible processes, but energy loss occurs in irreversible processes due to entropy. Examples of isentropic irreversible processes were requested, particularly in the context of efficiency. Overall, working with reversible processes is preferred to minimize energy loss and maximize efficiency.
Dili
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with these questions. Can anyone help please

1. How is it possible to have an isentropic process which is irreversible?

2.Why is it desirable to have processes which are less irreversible?

3. Is the expression for the 1st law of thermodynamics for a closed system process is same for both reversible and irreversible processes?
i.e. Q -W = U2-U1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A reversible process does not imply that system entropy is not changing, but universe entropy not increasing. So, the process can proceed in such a way that system entropy does not change and entropy of the system environment (the univers) will increase. So such a process would be irreversible.

Desirable? Something is desirable if it helps in pursuing a target. If you are looking for a big blast, for sure it won't be reversible. If you are lloking for a rechargeable battery, you would like to design an electrochemical process that proceeds closely reversibly.

For the third point, I would say that for irreversible processes this equation does not apply. There is always some loss of energy when the process is not reversible: this is entropy.
 
Thanks vivesdn

In the 1st question can you give an example for an isentropic irreversible process?

In the second question i was referring in line with efficiency

Can you give an equation of 1st law of thermo that applies to the irreversible process?

Any replies/opinions from others are welcome as well
 
All irreversible processes have an efficiency problem: universe entropy increases, so there is some energy loss (not disappeared, just invested in increasing universe disorder). But this is the toll you have to pay if you want something to happen quickly. As the process is more reversible, the less energy lost in entropy increase. So in terms of efficiency you would like to work always with reversible processes.
 
vivesdn said:
For the third point, I would say that for irreversible processes this equation does not apply. There is always some loss of energy when the process is not reversible: this is entropy.
In physics, laws are never broken. The first law always applies between any two equilibrium states. It does not depend upon the efficiency of the process in getting from one state to the other.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
In physics, laws are never broken. The first law always applies between any two equilibrium states. It does not depend upon the efficiency of the process in getting from one state to the other.

AM

OK. I must agree. The irreversible process will have a lower value for W than the corresponding reversible process between the same states (characterized by U1 and U2 ).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top