Solving Logarithm Problem: (-1/2)log2+(1/2)log1+(3/2)log4-(3/2)log4-(3/2)log3

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the logarithmic expression (-1/2)log2 + (1/2)log1 + (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log3. Participants clarify the application of logarithmic laws and the importance of evaluating operations from left to right when combining logarithms. One user successfully factors out 1/2 and simplifies the expression, while another emphasizes correct order of operations for addition and subtraction. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying logarithmic rules to reach the correct answer. Overall, the thread serves as a guide for understanding logarithmic manipulations and the evaluation process.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
(-1/2)log2 + (1/2)log1 + (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log3

= (1/2)log[(4^3)/(2x3^3)]

The above is from a textbook. Could anyone please show me the intermediate steps between the two lines? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
log A + log B = log AB

N log A = log (A^N)

similarly 2 log A + 0.5 log B = log (A^2) + log (B^0.5) = log (a^2 B^0.5)
 
Thanks. I've been using the log laws, though I can't seem to get the same answer which is given in the book.
 
Hi ZedCar! :smile:

Perhaps you can show us how you applied the log laws?
 
Question is: (-1/2)log2 + (1/2)log1 + (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log3

First I factored out 1/2

1/2 [-log2 + log1 + 3log4 - 3log4 - 3log3]

1/2 [-log(2x1) + 3log4 - 3log(4/3)]

1/2 [-log2 + 3log4 - 3log(4/3)]

1/2 [-log2 + 3log((4x3)/4))]

1/2 [3log((4x3)/4) - log2]

1/2 [3log((12x2)/4)]

1/2 [3log(24/4)]

1/2 [3log6]
 
ZedCar said:
Question is: (-1/2)log2 + (1/2)log1 + (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log4 - (3/2)log3

First I factored out 1/2

1/2 [-log2 + log1 + 3log4 - 3log4 - 3log3]

Good!


1/2 [-log(2x1) + 3log4 - 3log(4/3)]

I'm afraid that this is not quite right.


You have not applied the priority rules for addition and subtraction properly.
They should be evaluated left-to-right, like this:

1/2 [((((-log2) + log1) + 3log4) - 3log4) - 3log3]

I've added parentheses to specify the order of evaluation.

In particular -log2 should be evaluated as -1 x log2 = log 2-1 = log(1/2).


Perhaps you can redo this step?
 
Thanks very much I like Serena.

I've been able to figure it out now! Thank you.
 
I like Serena said:
You have not applied the priority rules for addition and subtraction properly.
They should be evaluated left-to-right, like this:

Is this the standard way of doing these? Start from the left and work right?
 
Cheers! :smile:
 
  • #10
ZedCar said:
Is this the standard way of doing these? Start from the left and work right?

Yes.
If you have mixed additions and subtractions, you have to do them from left to right.


However, there is an alternative, which is like this:

1/2 [-log2 + log1 + 3log4 - 3log4 - 3log3]

1/2 [(-1 x log2) + log1 + (3 x log4) + (-3 x log4) + (-3 x log3)]

If you do it like this, you can add in an arbitrary order, but multiplication comes first.
 
  • #11
That's great. Thanks very much again for that!
 
Back
Top