Solving logarithmic and exponential equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving logarithmic and exponential equations, specifically log3(x+2) + 1 = log3(x² + 4x) and 2^x + 2^(x+1) = 3. The first equation's solution involves correctly manipulating logarithmic properties, but there are mistakes in algebraic steps, particularly in simplifying the log expressions. For the exponential equation, participants clarify that combining terms incorrectly leads to confusion, and suggest using substitution to simplify the equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation and understanding logarithmic properties to arrive at the correct solutions. Overall, the thread provides insights into common pitfalls and effective strategies for solving these types of equations.
Mootjeuh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to solve trying logarithmic and exponential equations but for the life of me I can't seem to figure out what I'm doing wrong.


Homework Equations


Log equation: log3(x+2)+1 = log3x²+4x
Exp equation: 2x + 2x+1 = 3


The Attempt at a Solution


For the first one, here's what I did:
  • 1 = log3(x²+4x) - log3(x+2)
  • log3((x²+4x)/(x+2)) = 1
  • log3((x² +4x)/(x+2)) = 1
  • log3((x+4x)/2) = 1 --Can I do this? Dividing the denominator and numerator by the same value within a log
  • log3(x+2x) = 1
  • log3(3x) = 1
  • log33 + log3x = 1
  • 1 + log3x = 1
  • log3x = 0
  • x = 1

And then for the second one:
  • 2x + 2x+1 = 3
  • I figured I'd put them all on the same base so I tried to find 2 to what power equals 3
  • So I did ln(3)/ln(2) = 1.584962501, which for simplicity's sake I'll replace by y here
  • And when I put in 2y in my calculator it does give me 3 so it must be correct
  • x + x + 1 = y
  • 2x + 1 = y
  • x = (y-1)/2
But when I put the result back in the original equations, none of the answers I found seem to be correct.
I'm at my wit's end here, I don't know what else to try.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mootjeuh said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to solve trying logarithmic and exponential equations but for the life of me I can't seem to figure out what I'm doing wrong.

Homework Equations


Log equation: log3(x+2)+1 = log3x²+4x
For the log expression on the right side, do you mean log3(x2 + 4x)? That seems to be what you're doing in your work below.
Mootjeuh said:
Exp equation: 2x + 2x+1 = 3

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first one, here's what I did:
  • 1 = log3(x²+4x) - log3(x+2)
  • log3((x²+4x)/(x+2)) = 1
  • log3((x² +4x)/(x+2)) = 1
  • log3((x+4x)/2) = 1 --Can I do this? Dividing the denominator and numerator by the same value within a log
  • I have no idea what you did. How did you go from (x2 + 4x)/(x + 2) to (x + 4x)/2? That's not a valid step.
    Mootjeuh said:
    [*]log3(x+2x) = 1
    [*]log3(3x) = 1
    [*]log33 + log3x = 1
    [*]1 + log3x = 1
    [*]log3x = 0
    [*]x = 1
Mootjeuh said:
And then for the second one:
  • 2x + 2x+1 = 3
  • I figured I'd put them all on the same base so I tried to find 2 to what power equals 3
  • So I did ln(3)/ln(2) = 1.584962501, which for simplicity's sake I'll replace by y here
  • Where did this (above) come from?
    Mootjeuh said:
    [*]And when I put in 2y in my calculator it does give me 3 so it must be correct
    [*]x + x + 1 = y
    [*]2x + 1 = y
    [*]x = (y-1)/2
Mootjeuh said:
But when I put the result back in the original equations, none of the answers I found seem to be correct.
I'm at my wit's end here, I don't know what else to try.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Mootjeuh said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to solve trying logarithmic and exponential equations but for the life of me I can't seem to figure out what I'm doing wrong.

Homework Equations


Log equation: log3(x+2)+1 = log3x²+4x

That should be written: log3(x+2)+1 = log3(x²+4x)

Parentheses are important!

Exp equation: 2x + 2x+1 = 3

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first one, here's what I did:
  • 1 = log3(x²+4x) - log3(x+2)
  • log3((x²+4x)/(x+2)) = 1
  • log3((x² +4x)/(x+2)) = 1


  • OK so far.

    [*]log3((x+4x)/2) = 1 --Can I do this? Dividing the denominator and numerator by the same value within a log

    You can divide a rational expression within a log argument. But your algebra is totally wrong here, because ##\frac{x^2+4x}{x+2} \neq \frac{x+4x}{2}##. Please review your algebra.

    Instead of this, I would just take antilogs of both sides to get:

    ##\frac{x^2+4x}{x+2} = 3##

    and solve that quadratic. Be careful about which solution(s) is/are admissible.

    And then for the second one:
    • 2x + 2x+1 = 3
    • I figured I'd put them all on the same base so I tried to find 2 to what power equals 3


    • Doesn't help because ##a^x + a^y = a^z## does NOT imply that ##x + y = z##. In fact, there's no "easy" relationship between x, y and z here.

      To solve, observe that ##2^{x+1} = 2.2^x## (the dot signifies multiplication). Now put ##2^x = y## to get a simple linear equation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks, I didn't think of using an antilog, solved it smoothly.

Curious3141 said:
To solve, observe that ##2^{x+1} = 2.2^x## (the dot signifies multiplication). Now put ##2^x = y## to get a simple linear equation.
I kind of don't follow what happened here, where did 2x go?
 
Mootjeuh said:
Thanks, I didn't think of using an antilog, solved it smoothly.

I kind of don't follow what happened here, where did 2x go?
It's still there.
2x + 1 = 2 * 2x
 
Yeah but I mean the original formula was 2x + 2x+1 = 3, you moved it to the other side of the equals sign and it became 2 times 2x. Why not 3-2x?

I'm sure it's obvious and I completely missed it but it's 1am here and trying to finish this before going to sleep
 
The quantity log3((x² +4x)/(x+2)) represents the power to which you have to raise the number 3 to get ((x² +4x)/(x+2)). The equation log3((x² +4x)/(x+2))=1 says that the number 1 is the power to which you have to raise the number 3 to get ((x² +4x)/(x+2)). So, 31=((x² +4x)/(x+2))

Chet
 
Mootjeuh said:
Yeah but I mean the original formula was 2x + 2x+1 = 3, you moved it to the other side of the equals sign and it became 2 times 2x. Why not 3-2x?
Because doing that won't help you. If you subtract 2x from both sides, you get
2x + 1 = 3 - 2x
This isn't wrong, but it's not helpful, either, in getting you closer to a solution.

This is what you need to do:
2x + 2x+1 = 3
==>2x + 2*2x = 3
==> 2x(1 + 2) = 3
==>2x * 3 = 3
==>2x = 1
Now you can solve for x.
Mootjeuh said:
I'm sure it's obvious and I completely missed it but it's 1am here and trying to finish this before going to sleep
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Aaaah right 2x+1 = 2*2x is the same as 21*2x which makes the rest distributable now

Great thanks I can finally go catch some Zs now, you've been a real help!
 
Back
Top