Solving Magnetism Question: What Current & Direction is Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adwlacrosse75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
To achieve zero tension in the supporting wires of a conductor with a mass per unit length of 0.0500 kg/m in a magnetic field of 3.70 T, the magnetic force must equal the weight of the conductor. The weight can be expressed as the product of mass per unit length and length, allowing for a variable representation. The magnetic force on the conductor is calculated using the formula F = BILsin(theta), where B is the magnetic field strength, I is the current, and L is the length of the conductor. The direction of the current must be determined based on the right-hand rule to ensure the magnetic force opposes the weight. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
adwlacrosse75
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A conductor suspended by two flexible wires as shown in Figure P19.18 has a mass per unit length of 0.0500 kg/m.

Figure P19.18 (The picture is an attachment)

What current must exist in the conductor for the tension in the supporting wires to be zero when the magnetic field is 3.70 T into the page?

What is the required direction for the current?

Thanks a lot guys I'm new to the board and looking for some help. I appreciate it!
 

Attachments

  • p19-18.gif
    p19-18.gif
    9.7 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far?

How do you find the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire?
 
Magnetic force on a current carrying conductor/wire

F=B(magnetic field)I(Current)L(Length)sin(theta)

I have no idea where to start can you help me out here or just get me started.

Whats throwing me off is this mass per unit length and the tension
 
adwlacrosse75 said:
Whats throwing me off is this mass per unit length and the tension
The mass per unit length will help you find the weight of the conductor.

In order for there to be zero tension in the support wires, what must the net force be on the conductor?
 
well for there to be zero tension in the support wires the net force should just be the opposite of the weight just like a bouyant force on a floating object. But if I don't have a length how can i get the weight of the object. I think that's the exact thing that's screwing me up.
 
adwlacrosse75 said:
well for there to be zero tension in the support wires the net force should just be the opposite of the weight just like a bouyant force on a floating object.
That's not exactly right. (I think you're on the right track--you're just describing it incorrectly.) What two forces act on the conductor?
But if I don't have a length how can i get the weight of the object. I think that's the exact thing that's screwing me up.
Maybe you don't need an actual value. :wink: Hint: Just call the length L and see what happens.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top