Solving Newton's Third Law: Where Am I Going Wrong?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's Third Law in a problem involving two masses, one on an incline and the other hanging. The original poster presents equations of motion for both masses and attempts to solve for the coefficient of kinetic friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equations of motion for two masses, questioning the signs used in the equations and the direction of forces acting on the masses. There is a focus on the role of tension and gravitational forces, as well as the implications of sign conventions in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's calculations, particularly regarding the signs of acceleration and forces. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches, including the suggestion to use free body diagrams and energy considerations to clarify the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's calculations yield an unexpected result, prompting a deeper examination of the assumptions and setup of the problem. The discussion highlights the importance of consistent sign conventions and the need for clarity in the equations presented.

alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Please look at picture.

Here are my equations:
For 10kg:
-uk m2 g cosθ -T -m2 g sinθ=m2 a

For 20kg:
T-m1 g =m1 a

Add them:

-uk m2 g cosθ -m2 g sinθ -m1 g =(m2+m1) a

a= 5 m/s^2 (kinematics equations)

Isolating uk gives 3.66!

The real answer is 0.16.

Where am I going wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 1.35.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 1.35.20 PM.png
    24.2 KB · Views: 524
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational force on m2 (along the incline) points in the wrong direction in your first equation.
 
Sorry I wrongly typed it.

My original calculations also gave me this formula : -uk m2 g cosθ +m2 g sinθ -m1 g =(m2+m1) a

But, I got 3.66, which makes no sense.
 
Anyone?
 
You're not getting 3.66, only -3.66.

You're getting that because you have the wrong sign for the acceleration. If it's positive, it increases velocity, not decreases it. It pops up from the kinematic equations anyway. Go ahead and check it again.
 
alingy1 said:
Please look at picture.

Here are my equations:
For 10kg:
-uk m2 g cosθ -T -m2 g sinθ=m2 a

For mass 2, m2 if you choose to use a negative sign to go with the tension, T, then the sign convention for m2 is that motion to the left & down the ramp is positive motion. That's perfectly fine & it will work out very nicely for this problem. Friction will oppose the motion, so you used the correct sign with it. In what direction will gravity tend to make m2 move?

Your chosen sign convention also makes the sign of a2 be consistent with the sign of a1.

For 20kg:
T-m1 g =m1 a

Add them:

-uk m2 g cosθ -m2 g sinθ -m1 g =(m2+m1) a

a= 5 m/s^2 (kinematics equations)

Isolating uk gives 3.66!

The real answer is 0.16.

Where am I going wrong?
 
alingy1 said:
Sorry I wrongly typed it.

My original calculations also gave me this formula : -uk m2 g cosθ +m2 g sinθ -m1 g =(m2+m1) a

But, I got 3.66, which makes no sense.
It is pretty hard to figure out where you went wrong when you don't show us how you got your answer.

Take the suggestion from the question and do a free body diagram for each mass. Then write the equation of motion for each:


(1) T-m1g = m1a

(2) m2gsinθ -μk m2 g cosθ - T = m2a


Then all you have to do is solve the system of two equations for μk and a, which appears to be what you have done. Show us how you got your answer and we might be able to help you.

AM
 
Last edited:
He got his answer by substituting 5m/s^2 instead of -5m/s^2 for a.
 
Bandersnatch said:
He got his answer by substituting 5m/s^2 instead of -5m/s^2 for a.
Yes. Another approach to solving this is by using the change in energy:

change in energy = ΔKE + ΔPE = work done against friction.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K