Solving Puzzle of Limit of Integral: $\frac{2e^{-i\alpha x}}{1+\alpha^2}$?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the limit of an integral involving the expression e^{-i \alpha |x - t|} and its relationship to eigenfunctions and eigenvalues in a kernel context. The initial limit appears to be undefined due to the nature of the functions involved, leading to confusion about whether the result should be zero or equal to \frac{2e^{-i \alpha x}}{1 + \alpha^2}. The user explores the eigenvalue equation and attempts to compute the integral, ultimately realizing that the absolute value may not have been interpreted correctly in their calculations. They also introduce a new integral related to a kernel operating on an eigenfunction, expressing uncertainty about the best method to solve it, suggesting a potential need for residue calculus. The conversation highlights the complexities of evaluating integrals in the context of functional analysis and eigenvalue problems.
TOKAMAK
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
This isn't really homework for a class, but i figured this would be the most appropriate place for this question:
What would this quantity be?
\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} e^{-i \alpha |x - t|} \cdot (|x -t| - 1) - \lim_{t \rightarrow - \infty} e^{-i \alpha |x - t|} \cdot (|x -t| - 1) = ?

It looks to me like it is just zero, but I was hoping it would be:
\frac{2e^{-i \alpha x}}{1 + \alpha^2}

where \alpha is a real number, since this was the last step in proving that
f(t) = e^{-i \alpha t}

is an eigenfunction of the kernel:
K(x,t) = e^{-i \alpha |x - t|}

with an eigenvalue:
\lambda = \frac{2}{1 + \alpha^2}

Perhaps I solved my integral wrong or made a mistake somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quantity looks to be undefined. It looks to be of the form Y - Z, where Y and Z are themselves undefined, so clearly their difference is undefined. Each of the limits are themselves undefined because they are the limits of products of two functions, one of which is period, the other which goes to infinity.
 
Well, here's how I got there anyway:
I figured I could start with the eigenvalue equation:
\hat{K} |f \rangle = \lambda |f \rangle

Then I projected into position space:
\langle x| \hat{K} |f \rangle = \lambda \langle x|f \rangle

Threw in an identity operator:
\langle x| \hat{K} (\int^{\infty}_{- \infty} dt |t \rangle \langle t|)|f \rangle = \lambda \langle x|f \rangle

Which simplifies to:
\int^{\infty}_{- \infty} dt \cdot K(x,t) \cdot f(t) = \lambda \cdot f(x)

So then I just plugged in:
\int^{\infty}_{- \infty} dt \cdot e^{-|x - t|} \cdot e^{-i \alpha t} = \frac{2e^{-i \alpha x}}{1 + \alpha^2}

This leaves me with the problem of trying to find that integral, namely:
\int^{\infty}_{- \infty} dt \cdot e^{-|x - t|} \cdot e^{-i \alpha t}

I put this into Integrals.com and got this back:
\frac{|x -t| e^{-i (|x -t| + \alpha t)}}{(x - t)} |^{\infty}_{- \infty}

That's where the limit came from anyway.

Oh whoops, forgot to put this into the function above:
|x - t|
 
Last edited:
I don't think Integrals.com interpreted the absolute values correctly (if it uses Maple language, use abs(x) for |x|).

Anyway, better do the integral yourself. Make a change of variable u=x-t and split the integral into two parts, one where u>0 and u<0 (or x-t>0 and x-t<0 respectively).
 
Okay, so I was able to solve the first integral I posted. Now I have another integral (arising from a kernal operating on an eigenfunction):

\int^{\infty}_{0} dt \frac{t \sin{xt}}{a^{2} + t^{2}}

Not sure how to go about doing this one; doesn't look like integration by parts will work, and looking through a table of integrals didn't really help at all. I'm thinking I'll need to use residues for this (I guess this would be a good time to relearn how to do that).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top