Solving Relativity and Decay Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inconsistency
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Relativity
AI Thread Summary
A free electron in a vacuum cannot emit a single photon due to the conservation of momentum and energy, which leads to contradictions when considering photon emission. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing the problem from the electron's rest frame, where the initial momentum is zero. This approach simplifies the equations needed for momentum and energy conservation. Additionally, when discussing two-body decay, the emission angles of photons must be accounted for, as they influence the energy distribution. Ultimately, the conservation laws dictate that single photon emission by a free electron is impossible.
Inconsistency
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

1. Show that a free electron in a vacuum at velocity v cannot emit a single photon.

My ideas:

Momentum is conserved. Energy is conserved.

Hence (E(before)=E(after)): gamma(before)*m(e)*c^2 = E(photon) + gamma(after)*m(e)*c^2

where E(photon)=hc/lamda

(P(before)=P(after)): gamma(before)*m(e)*v(after) = E(photon)/c + gamma(after)*m(e)*v(after), where P and v are vectors.

This is where I get stuck. Do I have to worry about the emisssion angle - i.e. does the electron change direction? How do I proceed?

--

Also, where can I find information about two body decay of a moving particle?
I have computed the energy and velocity of a particle (pi meson), which now decays into two photons. I imagine the photon energies depend on the emission angles - but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in principle you should account for the possiblity that the photon is emitted at some angle relative to the electron's initial velocity. This gives you two equations for momentum conservation and one for energy conservation and you can show from these equations that the emission is impossible.

An easier way to approach to problem is to describe the emission of the photon in the initial rest frame of the electron. You can then make an argument based on the principle of relativity.
 
"An easier way to approach to problem is to describe the emission of the photon in the initial rest frame of the electron. You can then make an argument based on the principle of relativity."

Hmm... the electron will see the photon as moving away with c. I don't follow you.
 
Hint: if you consider the emission in the frame where the electron is initially at rest, the momentum of the system is zero.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top