Solving Rotation & Inertia Homework Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Julie323
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a wheel's motion down a hill, focusing on its rotational inertia and linear velocity. The initial calculations for mass and inertia were incorrect due to confusion between diameter and radius, as well as the application of the moment of inertia formulas. Participants suggested using the correct formulas for the moment of inertia and emphasized the need to include both rotational and linear kinetic energy in the energy conservation equation. After several attempts, the user recalculated the inertia but still arrived at an incorrect velocity, indicating a misunderstanding of the kinetic energy components. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles and formulas in solving rotational motion problems.
Julie323
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 44.0-cm diameter wheel, consisting of a rim and six spokes, is constructed from a thin rigid plastic material having a linear mass density of 25.0 g/cm. This wheel is released from rest at the top of a hill 56.0 high.

How fast is it rolling when it reaches the bottom of the hill?


How would your answer change if the linear mass density and the diameter of the wheel were each doubled?

Homework Equations



I of a hoop=mr^2
I of a rod=1/12 ML^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I set mgh=.5Iw^2 Inertia=m(rim)r^2+6(1/12 ML^2). I found the mass of the rim by finding the circumference and multiplied it by the density giving me 3.456 kg, plugged .22 m in for the radius. Then I found the mass of a spoke by multiplying .44cm by 2.5 g/cm which gave me 1.1 kg. I plugged that in with L being .44. This gave me an inertia of .274. This made the energy equation (10.056)(9.8)(56)=.5(.274)w^2. Solving for w gave me 200.2 rad/s which I then multiplied by .22 to give me a velocity of 44.2 m/s. But that was wrong. Where did I go wrong? Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you've confused diameter and radius. Each of the six spokes should have length 22 cm each.
 
Okay, well I tried that which changed inertia to be .1806 and ultimately gave me a velocity of 54.4 m/s, which was also wrong. Do you have any other ideas?
 
Hi Julie! :smile:
Julie323 said:
A 44.0-cm diameter wheel, consisting of a rim and six spokes,

I set mgh=.5Iw^2 Inertia=m(rim)r^2+6(1/12 ML^2) …

No, 1/12 ML2 is the moment of inertia of a rod about its centre

you need the moment of inertia about the centre of the wheel, ie the end of each spoke …

so either use the formula for the end (which you should know, but if you don't, you can use the parallel axis theorem ),

or treat it as three spokes, of mass 2M and diameter 2L ! :biggrin:
 
Hey!
So I figured out that I had the wrong equation a little earlier. I redid the problem, and it still came out wrong. I will go through what I did, and maybe you can tell me what is wrong:
I started with the equation:
mgh=Iw^2.
I of rim=MR^2, R=.22m M=(.44m)(π)(2.5kg/m)=3.456kg
I of spoke=1/3ML^2, L=.22m M=(.22m)(2.5kg/m)=.55kg
I of rim+I of 6 spokes=.2205.

Returning to initial equation:
(3.456+6*.55)(9.8)(56)=.2205w^2
w=129.67
wr=v, r=.22m
v=28.5 m/s

Any idea where I went wrong? Thanks!
 
Hey Julie! :smile:

(have an omega: and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

I'm finding it rather difficult to read your equations, but I don't think you've included the linear KE. :redface:

(total KE = rotational KE about c.o.m. + linear KE of c.o.m.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top