Solving Rotational Kinetics Homework: Angular Acceleration of Flywheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a rotational kinetics homework problem involving a flywheel's angular acceleration and linear acceleration of a particle. The flywheel initially spins at 176 rev/min and comes to rest in 2.8 hours, prompting the need to calculate the constant angular acceleration. Participants discuss the conversion of units and the application of relevant equations, including the relationship between angular velocity and tangential acceleration. Confusion arises regarding which values to use for calculations, particularly when transitioning between different parts of the problem. The thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying formulas and unit conversions to arrive at the correct answers.
ohhi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The flywheel of a steam engine runs with a constant angular speed of 176 rev/min. When steam is shut off, the friction of the bearings and the air brings the wheel to rest in 2.8 hours. What is the magnitude of the constant angular acceleration of the wheel? (Use units of rev/min^2. )

What is the magnitude of the tangential component of the linear acceleration of a particle that is located at a distance of 53 cm from the axis of rotation when the flywheel is turning at 88 rev/min? QUESTION 1 ABOVE DESCRIBES THE MOTION OF THIS FLYWHEEL.

What is the magnitude of the net linear acceleration of the particle in the above question?



Homework Equations


a=(wr)^2 * 1/r

rev/min = 2rad/min
rad/min = rad/60s
rad/s = (3.14d)m/s

The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted the problem by doing the conversion and plugging it into the equation, but I cannot get the right answer. Can someone please explain the fault in my reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
omega=176 rev /min =176/60 rev/sec
time taken = 2.8 hours.= 2.8*3600 sec
final omega=0
>>0=176/60 + alpha *2.8*3600
solve for alpha yourself.
you will get the answer in rev/sec^2.
divide it by 60 to get the desired result.

tangential acceleration=v/t
v is given by omega * radius of rotation
>>(176/60 * .53) this gives you the velocity of the particle. in rev/sec.

now tangential accln= v/t
>> [(176/60)*.53] / 2.8*3600
 
I'm confused as to what numbers to use. Am I using the numbers from the first problem or the second?
 
I can't get it to work out.
 
w =(88*.53)/60 *2pi = 4.88 rad/s

a_tan= wr = (4.88 rad/s) * (.53m) = 2.59 rad/s^2 = (pi)(d)(2.59) m/s^2 = 8.61 m/s^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top