Solving the Schrödinger Equation: Need Help!

asi123
Messages
254
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey guys.

I have this problem:

http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/1561/78854429.jpg

For the first part, I believe that adding those solution is just like adding the two levels of energy they represents and that's way this is not a solution for the equation, I think.

For the second part, I have no idea.
Can I please have some help?

Thanks.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When in doubt, return to the mathematical expression for the Schrodinger's equation.

Schrodinger's equation is \hat H \psi_n = E_n \psi_n.

In 1D,
\hat H = \frac{\hbar^2}{2 m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V(x)

As this eigenfunction equation is linear, having the Hamiltonian \hat H act on a superposition of eigenfunctions \psi_n givens a superposition of \psi_n and their corresponding energies.

A similar principle holds for the next part.
 
Just plug the proposed solution into the Schrödinger's equation and show that it satisfies the equation (both sides are equal).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top