Solving the Slender Ladder Problem: Angular Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a slender ladder with a mass of 10 kg released from rest, leading to a derived angular acceleration of 3.75 rad/s². Participants express frustration over the absence of this answer in a multiple-choice test, questioning whether the professor made an error. Various approaches to solving the problem are debated, including the use of torque and constraint equations, with some arguing that more equations are needed than unknowns. Confirmation of the 3.75 rad/s² result is provided, and an alternative method involving the instantaneous axis of rotation is suggested for simplification. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for clarity in calculations.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
2zeff2e.png

The slender ladder has a mass of 10 kg. It is released from rest in the position shown. Friction at the two contact surfaces are negligible. Determine the angular acceleration of the ladder.

I summed forces in the x,y direction, summed moments about the ladder's center of mass, wrote a kinematics equation relating the angular acceleration to the acceleration of its center of mass for a total of 5 unknowns (Force at bottom, ax, ay, angular acceleration, force at the vertical wall) and 5 equations. I have angular acceleration = 3.75 rad/s^2. This was on a multiple choice test, but there was no answer of 3.75 rad/s^2. I've been at this problem for days, making the same "mistake" over and over. I have found that the solutions manual of a similar problem is also doing the same thing I'm doing. Did my professor make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi eurekameh! :smile:

(pleeeease don't post such wide images :redface:)

(it should be possible with just one τ = Iα equation, and one constraint equation … anyway:)

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
3.75 rad/s^2 is correct.
 
tiny-tim:
I don't think it's possible with just one tau = (I)(alpha) equation and one constraint equation because then you'd have too many unknowns with not enough equations.
Denoting Fx as the force from wall, and Fy as the force from floor:
For forces in x;
Fx = max
For forces in y;
Fy - mg = may
And for moments about center of mass;
(Fy)(cos60) - (Fx)(sin60) = (1/12)(m)(l^2)(alpha)
The two constraint equations gave me:
ay = -(alpha)(cos60)
ax = (alpha)(sin60)
5 unknowns in 5 equations gave me 3.75 rad/s^2.
Thanks for the confirmation, Quinzio. :)
 
hi eurekameh! :smile:
eurekameh said:
tiny-tim:
I don't think it's possible with just one tau = (I)(alpha) equation and one constraint equation because then you'd have too many unknowns with not enough equations.

yes you can if you do it τ = dL/dt about P, the point where the normals meet …

τ = dL/dt = d/dt {Ic.o.mω + mrc.o.m x vc.o.m} = Ic.o.mα + mrc.o.m x ac.o.m

give it a try! :wink:

(i don't know why i said Iα before :redface:)
 
YES, so it by instantaneous axis of rotation. search it up on google if you don't know about it. it becomes very easy
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top