Solving Torque Equation: Door with Mass 20kg, 2 Hinges

  • Thread starter Thread starter BI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a torque equation for a door with a mass of 20kg, supported by two hinges. The door is in static equilibrium, and the correct pivot point is identified as the bottom hinge. The torque due to the door's weight is calculated as -196 Nm, while the torques from the bottom and top hinges are 49 Nm and 147 Nm, respectively. The net torque sums to 0 Nm, confirming the door's static equilibrium. The approach and direction of forces in the torque calculations are affirmed as correct.
BI
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have this problem with torque and not sure if I approached it correctly or not.

A door is 1m wide and 2m high, has a mass of 20kg, and is supported by two hinges, each bearing 1/2 the weight of the door. The hinges are attached to the left of the door at locations 1/2m above the bottom edge and 1/2m below the top edge. It is in static equilbrium.

So, I write out the two conditions:
vector sum of net force= (Wdoor along -j)+(Fsupport1 along j)+(Fsupport2along j)=0
vector sum of net torque= 0
I'm stuck at this, I don't know if I wrote the equation right or not. Please help. I don't know where to put the pivot point in this example either. Is the direction for the forces right? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your equation is correct. The pivot point in this example is the location of the hinges. For each force, you can use either a positive or negative sign depending on the direction of the force. In this case, it looks like the weight of the door is acting downwards (in the -j direction), so you can use a negative sign for that force. The forces from the two hinges will be acting in the +j direction, so you can use a positive sign for those forces.
 


Your approach to the problem is correct. The pivot point for this problem would be at the bottom hinge since it is the point where the door is rotating about.

To solve for the torque equation, you would need to consider the distance between the pivot point and each force acting on the door. In this case, the distance between the pivot point and the weight of the door would be 1m, the distance between the pivot point and the force of support from the bottom hinge would be 0.5m, and the distance between the pivot point and the force of support from the top hinge would be 1.5m.

The equation for torque is T = F x d, where T is torque, F is the force, and d is the distance between the pivot point and the force.

So for the weight of the door, the torque would be -20kg x 9.8m/s^2 x 1m = -196 Nm (negative because it is in the opposite direction of the clockwise rotation).

For the force of support from the bottom hinge, the torque would be (1/2)(20kg x 9.8m/s^2) x 0.5m = 49 Nm (positive because it is in the same direction as the clockwise rotation).

And for the force of support from the top hinge, the torque would be (1/2)(20kg x 9.8m/s^2) x 1.5m = 147 Nm (positive because it is in the same direction as the clockwise rotation).

Now, to solve for the net torque, you would add all of these torques together: -196 Nm + 49 Nm + 147 Nm = 0 Nm. This means that the net torque is 0 Nm, which is what we want since the door is in static equilibrium.

In summary, your approach to the problem is correct and the direction of the forces is also correct. Just remember to consider the distances between the pivot point and each force when solving for the torque equation.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top