Solving Two-Pendulum Collision: Find Max Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProBasket
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a two-pendulum collision problem involving pendulum bobs of different masses. The first pendulum bob (m1) is released from a height and collides with the second bob (m2), resulting in an inelastic collision where they stick together. The speed of m1 just before the collision is confirmed to be 1.35 m/s. The main challenge is determining the maximum angle to which the combined masses swing after the collision, with the initial calculations yielding an incorrect angle of 61 degrees instead of the correct 27 degrees. The key takeaway is that while momentum is conserved during the collision, energy is not, leading to discrepancies in the calculated angles.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Two simple pendulums of equal length (L=40cm) are suspended from the same point. The pendulum bobs are point-like masses of m1=450g and m2=150g. the more massive bob (m1) is initially drawn back at an angle of \theta_0 = 40^o from vertical, as shown(in attached pic). After m1 is released it swings down to \theta = 0 where it collisdes with m2 and the masses stick together. I have the answers to the following problems, but i would like to know how to do it.

a.) Find the speed of m1 just before the collision. this one was pretty simple, the answer was 1.35m/s and it matches the answer given.

b.) Determind the maximum angle to which the masses swing after the collision. well from problem a.) i found that v_i = \sqrt{2gL(1-cos(45))}

when the bigger mass hits the smaller mass, U_o = mgL(1-cos(\theta)) right? and K_o = 0. at the end of the collision, K_f = 1/2mv^2 and U_f = 0. which means v_{2f}^2 = 2gL(1-cos(\theta_2)) right?

well plugging everything i know to V_{2f}^2 = (\frac{(2*m_1)}{m_1+m_2})^2*v_i^2 m1 = 450 and L = .4 m right? i get V_{2f}^2 = 4.1

then setting 4.1 equal to v_2f 4.1 =2gL(1-cos(\theta_2)) and solving for theta, i get 61 degrees. but the real answer is 27, what did i do wrong?
 

Attachments

  • pendulums.jpg
    pendulums.jpg
    2 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
Unlike the total momentum,the total energy is not conserved during this inelastic collision.
Regards,
Einstone.
 
You say the larger mass is held at 40 degrees in the statement of the problem but use 45 degrees later. Since "Frogpad", giving essentially the same problem in a different post uses 40 degrees, I am going to assume that is correct.

Raising the mass on a 40 cm pendulum arm by 40 degrees means it is raised 40(1- cos(40)) cm vertically and so has potential energy 450g(40(1- cos(40))= 4131186 ergs(g here is the acc due to gravity- 981 cm/s2- rather than "grams") relative to its original position. Just before it strikes the second weight, it is back to its original position and so has 0 potential energy. All the potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy: its kinetic energy is 4131186 ergs. Since kinetic energy is (1/2)mv2= 4131186, we have v2= 8262374/450= 18360 so
v= 135.5 cm/s, just what you got!

Now the two masses stick together so we can think of that as a single mass of 450+350= 800 g. As einstone said, since this is not an elastic collision,energy is not conserved and but momentum is: the initial momentum of the system was the momentum of the first mass (450 g)(135.5 cm/s)= 60976 dynes. The momentum after the collision (800 g)(v cm/s)= 60976 so v= 60976/800= 76.3 cm/s.

Now, calculate the kinetic energy of an 800 g mass moving at 76.3 cm/s. Find the height and then angle that will give potential energy for an 800 g mass equal to that kinetic energy. The difference between that and the original kinetic energy (= original potential energy) is the change in energy due to the collision.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top