Solving yo-yo problem using only energy equations - is this ok?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mm2424
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a yo-yo's linear acceleration using energy equations instead of traditional force equations. The user successfully applies the conservation of energy principle, equating initial potential energy to the sum of translational and rotational kinetic energy, leading to a calculated linear velocity and acceleration. They express concern about the validity of their approach since it differs from the solution manual's method. Responses confirm that the energy method is sound, suggesting it as a valid alternative while recommending verification through force equations. Overall, the energy approach yields consistent results, affirming its correctness.
mm2424
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A yo-yo has a rotational inertia of 960 gcm^2 and a mass of 120 g. Its axle radius is 3.2 mm and its string is 120 cm long. The yo-yo rolls from rest down to the end of the string. What is the magnitude of its linear acceleration?

Homework Equations



T - mg = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I know there is an equation that specifically allows you to calculate the acceleration of the center of mass of a yo-yo, but I'm trying to figure it out without using that equation. I also see in the solution manual that the correct strategy is to analyze the forces acting on the yo-yo at the bottom, and then use torque expressions to find the Tension in terms of the acceleration and the radius of the axle.

My question is just whether it's ok to solve this problem using energy equations instead of force equations. I took the following stab and seem to have arrived at a similar answer to the answer key. I just want to make sure this reasoning is sound, as I have found two answers to the problem so far and neither uses these energy equations.

I set the problem up as follows, where v equals the linear velocity of the yo-yo, m equals the mass of the yo-yo, h is the length of the string, and r is the radius of its axle:

Initial Energy of System = Final Energy of System

(m)(gravity)(h) = 1/2(m)(v^2) + 1/2(I)(ω^2).

(120 g)(980 cm/s^2)(120 cm) = 1/2(120 g)(v^2) + 1/2(950gcm^2)(v^2 / r^2)

Solving this, I found that v=54.8 cm/s.

I then plugged this into (final linear velocity)^2 = 2ah and found that a was 12.51 cm/s^2.

Is this an ok approach?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your method is perfectly sound. Why not solve it using force equations to double check?
 
Thanks! It seems to work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top