Some advice/ book suggestions needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Suggestions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a physics major in mastering proofs in analysis and calculus, particularly delta-epsilon proofs. The individual expresses a desire to improve their understanding of theorems and axioms, which are crucial for advanced topics in mathematical physics. Recommendations for books to enhance proof skills include "Elementary Analysis: The Theory of Calculus" by Ken Ross, "Foundations of Mathematical Analysis" by Johnsonbaugh and Pfaffenberger, and for a more challenging read, "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin. It is advised to approach these texts methodically, focusing on understanding theorems deeply rather than rote memorization, and to practice proving theorems independently to solidify comprehension. Taking an introductory analysis class is also suggested to build a strong foundation in proofs.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
I am a physics major but i do want to also major in analysis and calculus. But ihav always had difficulties with the proofs involved (not unlike many of my friends). Although i learn the threorems and axioms it is always so hard for me to really apply them, especially the delta epsilon proofs. I know a lot of proofs - convergence, limits, sup and inf - involve those kind of proofs. Is there a book(s) i can perhaps look into the helping me master the technique?
I have a strong interest in mathematics and i do want to perhaps do mathematical physics since many discoveries i have read of involve calculus theorems that are generally not taught in the undergrad level. (although my knowledge of course content in grad courses is minimal)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you did well in calc 1,2,3 then I would say to try and squeeze in an "intro to analysis class" if you can. You will learn a lot about proofs, some schools call it advanced calculus. As for books I would check out:

elementary analysis: the theory of calculus, by Ken Ross
foundations of mathematical analysis, by johnsonbaugh and pfaffenberger

If you really want a challenge check out
Principles of mathematical analysis, by walter rudin

If you find those books are still to easy get
Measure and Integral by Wheeden and Zygmund

If you get any of these book start from the beginning and learn the theorems. I mean learn them inside and out and know what they mean in regular words, don't just memorize the symbols.
When you think you know a theorem try to prove it without looking at the book, that's how I taught my self how to do analysis and now I am a beast.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top