Sound pressures at the open end

  • Thread starter Thread starter ivanhooace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an A-level student's investigation into sound pressure differences in an open-ended tube, where they observed unexpected EMF readings from a microphone placed at varying distances from the speaker. The student expected a sine graph due to pressure variations, but noted a significant drop in EMF from 100mV to 49mV near the open end. Responses highlight that the microphone detects both pressure and air displacement, emphasizing the importance of its orientation and position for accurate measurements. Additionally, it is noted that placing the microphone at the tube's end alters the resonant frequency and reflection properties, affecting pressure amplitude. The conversation underscores the complexities of sound wave behavior in open-ended tubes and the need for precise experimental setup.
ivanhooace
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys
I am a A level student. Lately, i have done a practical investigation on pressure difference of the sounds in the air (Inside a both opened end tube). There is some question that i would like to know and I am wondering If anyone could help me please?
The experiment is carried out by varying the distance of the microphone to the speaker inside the tube. Before the experiment was carried out, I have expected to see a sine graph. At both the open end, the pressure variation is at its minimum; therefore the EMF generated by microphone will be the smallest.
(Note: the reasons saying it is a sine graph is that a microphone is detecing the pressure... not the displacement of air molecules)
Well, the experiment did verify my hypothesis; nevertheless, a bizarre data occurred to me that the EMF dropped from 100mv to 49mv upon reaching the end. (the 100mv is obtained at a distance 1 or 2 cm away from the open end). Before that, the EMF varied gradually, but it decreases rapidly as the microphone approaching the open end.
The only explanation I could think of is that the air molecule moves freely at the opened end ( As it is just beside the “outside of the tube”). However, since there will be some reflection as a result of the collision of the air molecules at the opened end, the pressure variation should not be very low, at least not decreased rapidly…
the picture attached shows the setup of my instruments.
:smile:
The sequence of the EMF from one open end A to another B is
49, 160, 190, 210, 250, 280,320, 360, 400, 440, 487, 520, 487, 440,400, 360,320, 280, 250, 210, 190, 160, 49

Notice that the EMF changes rapidly upon reaching A and B.
 

Attachments

  • sample.JPG
    sample.JPG
    9 KB · Views: 465
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
why no one reply my question? poor me...
 
(Note: the reasons saying it is a sine graph is that a microphone is detecing the pressure... not the displacement of air molecules)

this is not entirely correct.
it is detecting both, as they are related.
when the pressure is at a maximum, the displacement of the air molecules are at a minimum. when the pressure is at a minimum, the displacement of the air molecules is at a maximum.
the nodal points occur at maximum pressure.
maximum amplitude occurs when the pressure is at a minimum.

how are you measuring the emf of the microphone?
 
If the "active" surface Area of the microphone is not exactly parallel to the tube wall surface Area, some of the momentum of the moving air molecules will lead to microphone EMF, which would make interpretation of the EMF ambiguous. You should have been VERY careful to not change the orientation of the microphone, or its distance from the axis of the tube, even when it was outside the tube.

If you were driving the speaker at EXACTLY the resonance frequency of the tube, the pressure amplitude should've been quite a bit LESS than 49 mV , just a little bit outside the tube (a pressure node is usually about pi R/2 outside of the tube end - but exactly how far depends on the stiffness of the tube material).

Putting the microphone in the end of the tube will
(1) change the resonant frequency of the tube
(2) change the reflection properties at that end of the tube
(3) change the pressure amplitude all thru the tube, mostly near that end.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top