Sound waves produced by an aircraft

AI Thread Summary
An aircraft at rest produces sound waves that spread uniformly in a spherical pattern, while a plane traveling at the speed of sound generates overlapping sound waves that form a conical shape due to its motion. When flying slower than sound, the aircraft does not remain at the center of the spherical wavefronts, as it moves forward, causing the wavefronts to be non-concentric. The discussion highlights the concept of the Mach angle, which describes the change in wavefront characteristics as speed increases. Participants emphasize that sonic booms are well-understood phenomena, suggesting that existing explanations are sufficient. The conversation concludes with a recognition of the importance of established scientific concepts in understanding sound wave behavior related to aircraft.
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Suppose that an aircfract somehow is not moving. Then I would expect the sound waves it produces to spread out uniformely in a spherical fashion. Now imagine a airplane traveling at approximately the speed of sound. In this case, if the airplane produces a wave at point A and after a time T the sound sphere has a radius R, then at R the airplane will produce another sound wave. The centre of this later sound sphere would always lie at the surface of the earlier sound sphere, because both are traveling at the same speed. The result in a time lapse would be like this
P4as5TQg.png


As opposed to this, an aircraft traveling at a lower than sound speed would draw a pattern like this
ZDJvdXn.png

The main difference being that the two sphere surfaces don't "meet".

Now this reasoning is from my nearly zero understanding of waves.This is an attempt to explain sonic boom in simple terms. I did a previous search on web to find out whether this is correct or not, but didn't find any pictures like these above.
 

Attachments

  • P4as5TQg.png
    P4as5TQg.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 711
  • ZDJvdXn.png
    ZDJvdXn.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 623
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that, for the case of v<vsound, that the airplane is at the center of the spherical wavefronts? The wavefronts are traveling at the speed of sound in air, but the aircraft is also moving in one direction. So it should be closer to the wavefront in front of it than the wavefront behind it.

And each subsequent wavefronts are not "concentric" with the previous wavefronts, because the center of the source of sound (the airplane) have moved.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Why do you think that, for the case of v<vsound, that the airplane is at the center of the spherical wavefronts? The wavefronts are traveling at the speed of sound in air, but the aircraft is also moving in one direction. So it should be closer to the wavefront in front of it than the wavefront behind it.

And each subsequent wavefronts are not "concentric" with the previous wavefronts, because the center of the source of sound (the airplane) have moved.

Zz.
Oh yea, I should have considered the displacement of the airplane.
 
Does this animation answer your question?

[URL='http://By Lookang many thanks to Fu-Kwun Hwang and author of Easy Java Simulation = Francisco Esquembre - Own work said:
Dopplereffectsourcemovingrightatmach1.4.gif
 
anorlunda said:
Does this animation answer your question?
It helps. How can we use it to explain the sonic boom?
 
Another picture may help. Note how the character of the wave front changes from spherical to conical as the airplane speed increases.
http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/project/car/aerodynamics said:
sonic_boom%5B1%5D.jpg
 

Attachments

  • sonic_boom%5B1%5D.jpg
    sonic_boom%5B1%5D.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 1,091
kent davidge said:
It helps. How can we use it to explain the sonic boom?
Have you done any research on your own regarding sonic booms? They are a well understood phenomenon and there is plenty of information available so I don't understand why you think it is necessary to try to create a new explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
kent davidge said:
It helps. How can we use it to explain the sonic boom?

You can't, but you have independently stumbled across the well-known phenomenon known as a Mach angle.
 
Back
Top