Calculating Energy Required for Space Shuttle Orbit Boost

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Space
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy required for the space shuttle to boost from a 250 km to a 610 km orbit, the change in mechanical energy must be considered, which includes both kinetic and potential energy. The initial calculations yielded an energy requirement of 2.33E11 J, but this was incorrect due to the omission of kinetic energy in the potential energy equation. The correct approach involves using the formula for gravitational potential energy and recognizing that the change in mechanical energy is half the change in gravitational potential energy. After calculating the gravitational potential energy at both altitudes, the correct energy required is confirmed to be 1.17E11 J. Understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy is crucial for accurate orbital mechanics calculations.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The space shuttle is in a 250 km high circular orbit. It needs to reach a 610 km high circular orbit to catch the Hubble telescope for repairs. The shuttle's mass is 75000 kg. How much energy is required to boost it to the new orbit?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I keep coming up with answer that is twice the answer in the back of my book

Uf= E + Ui
(-6.67E-11)(5.98E24kg)(75000kg)/(610000m+6.37E6) = E + (-6.67E-11)(5.98E24)(75000kg)/(250000m+6.37E6)

E= 2.33E11 J


book gives 1.17E11
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are ignoring kinetic energy.
 
bcjochim07 said:

Homework Statement


The space shuttle is in a 250 km high circular orbit. It needs to reach a 610 km high circular orbit to catch the Hubble telescope for repairs. The shuttle's mass is 75000 kg. How much energy is required to boost it to the new orbit?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I keep coming up with answer that is twice the answer in the back of my book

Uf= E + Ui
(-6.67E-11)(5.98E24kg)(75000kg)/(610000m+6.37E6) = E + (-6.67E-11)(5.98E24)(75000kg)/(250000m+6.37E6)

E= 2.33E11 J


book gives 1.17E11

In Uf= E + Ui,
Ui should be the sum of kinetic energy mv^2/2 and potential energy -GmM/r
using GmM/r^2 = mv^2/r, we can get mv^2/2 = GmM/(2r)
so U = -GmM/(2r), not -GmM/r as you used.
then we can get the half of your answer.
 
I know for a fact that this solution is correct:

We are looking for the change in mechanical energy.

Emech = (1/2)Ug
Therefore, ∆Emech = (1/2)∆Ug

G = 6.67 X 10^-11
Me = 5.98 X 10^24 kg
Ms = 7.5 X 10^4 kg
Re = 6.37 X 10^6 m
r1 = Re + 2.5 X 10^5 m
r2 = Re + 6.1 X 10^5 m

Solve for Ug at r1. (Call this Ug1)
Ug1 = (-G(Me)(Ms))/(r1) = -4.519 X 10^12 J

Solve for Ug at r2. (Call this Ug2)
Ug2 = (-G(Me)(Ms))/(r2) = -4.286 X 10^12 J

∆Ug = Ug2 - Ug1 = 2.33 X 10^11 J

∆Emech = (1/2)∆Ug = 1.17 X 10^11 J
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top