TommyC
- 6
- 0
Firstly, I'm a newby to PF. Secondly, I've studied calculus (2 semesters) but it's been >35 years.
I'm interested in deriving a simple formula for computing the partial volume of a sphere. Such a volume would be from the surface to some point along its radius toward the center. Crudely, suppose you could whack off (along a plane) a piece of a sphere, invert it and fill it w/ liquid. If you knew the piece's depth, how much liquid would it hold?
From Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere), I've captured the integration to the attached a MS Word file (I'm not sure how to capture the piece w/ its equation to this comment field and have it look right). Maybe someone can reply and bring it into this comment field.
I believe the sense of the integration implied by the formula is from the center of the sphere to some point (x) along its radius toward the surface. My interest is just the reverse.
In any case, if someone could please help me out w/ a simple formula in terms of the radius and depth of the severed piece, that would be fantastic. (I can well imagine this was probably on one of my tests in integral calculus but I can no longer remember.
)
I'm interested in deriving a simple formula for computing the partial volume of a sphere. Such a volume would be from the surface to some point along its radius toward the center. Crudely, suppose you could whack off (along a plane) a piece of a sphere, invert it and fill it w/ liquid. If you knew the piece's depth, how much liquid would it hold?
From Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere), I've captured the integration to the attached a MS Word file (I'm not sure how to capture the piece w/ its equation to this comment field and have it look right). Maybe someone can reply and bring it into this comment field.
I believe the sense of the integration implied by the formula is from the center of the sphere to some point (x) along its radius toward the surface. My interest is just the reverse.
In any case, if someone could please help me out w/ a simple formula in terms of the radius and depth of the severed piece, that would be fantastic. (I can well imagine this was probably on one of my tests in integral calculus but I can no longer remember.
