Special relativity (A.P. French 7.5)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving an elastic collision between two particles with different rest masses, emphasizing the need to express recoil and scattering angles in the lab frame based on the zero-momentum system. The key challenge is to relate the angles in the center-of-mass (COM) frame to those in the lab frame, particularly for a particle of rest mass m colliding with a stationary particle of rest mass M. Participants highlight the importance of using the binomial theorem to demonstrate that the relativistic expressions reduce to classical mechanics when the velocity is much less than the speed of light (v<<c). The conversation indicates a need for clarity on the transformation of angles between the two frames and the implications for momentum and kinetic energy. Ultimately, the goal is to derive the correct relationships while ensuring they align with non-relativistic physics under specific conditions.
ladybeetle
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of rest mass m and velocity v collides elastically with a stationary particle of rest mass M. Express the recoil and scattering angels in terms of the corresponding angles in the zero-momentum system. Show that your answers reduce to the non-relativistic ones if v<<c


Homework Equations



I think I have to show that (mc^2)/(1-(v/c)^2)^1/2 reduces to .5mv^2 by using the binomial theorem when v<<c. since momentum is related to kinetic energy.

The Attempt at a Solution



(not clear how to do it though) Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not what the question is asking you to do. In the center-of-mass system, say the particle with mass m scatters at an angle of ##\theta'##. What happens to the other particle? Now what does this collision look like as seen in the lab frame? What angle ##\theta## in the lab frame corresponds to the angle ##\theta'## in the COM frame?

Once you figure that out, you're supposed to show it reduces to the non-relativistic equivalents when v<<c.
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K