Special Relativity Book for Jackson Notation - Does it Exist?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a rigorous text on special relativity (SR) that utilizes notation similar to Jackson's Electromagnetism, specifically focusing on 4-vectors and tensors while covering key concepts like time dilation and length contraction. Participants recommend "A First Course in General Relativity" by Schutz for its accessibility to the basics of SR and tensors. Another suggested text is Gourgoulhon's work, which offers a more in-depth exploration of the subject. The consensus is to start with Schutz for foundational understanding before progressing to Gourgoulhon for a deeper study. The conversation also highlights the importance of personal recommendations in discovering valuable resources in the field of physics.
Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0
I haven't specifically studied SR yet. My only exposure to it has been in the classical field theory section of Jackson's Electromagnetism and Landau Lifshitz Classical Theory of Fields. I understood what was going on and how it was related to the electromagnetic field etc but I don't feel as if Ihave actually learned SR.

I'm looking for a rigorous special relativity text written in the same notation as Jackson (4-vectors and tensors) and which actually goes into the consequences of SR such as time dilation and length contraction.

Does such a text exist?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe_Memorie said:
I'm looking for a rigorous special relativity text written in the same notation as Jackson (4-vectors and tensors) and which actually goes into the consequences of SR such as time dilation and length contraction.

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730724

This is the absolute best book I personally know of on the subject. My opinions on it are summarized in that thread.
 
  • Like
Likes madscientist_93
WannabeNewton said:
www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730724

This is the absolute best book I personally know of on the subject. My opinions on it are summarized in that thread.
I had not seen that thread, or heard of this book before. It does look very good (so far based on the table of contents alone). I will have to get a copy for myself.

I still think that Schutz may be better for someone who just wants to pick up the basics of SR and tensors quickly, but Gourgoulhon (LOL that name) covers so much more. There's some stuff in there that I have wanted to read about for years.

So...Maybe_Memorie, consider getting both. My modified suggestion is that you read those three chapters in Schutz first, and then use Gourgoulhon when you're ready to go really deeply into the subject.
 
Fredrik said:
I had not seen that thread, or heard of this book before. It does look very good (so far based on the table of contents alone).

I wouldn't have heard of it either if it wasn't for George! He's introduced me to so many good books over the months (years?). I really recommend getting it.

Fredrik said:
I still think that Schutz may be better for someone who just wants to pick up the basics of SR and tensors quickly, but Gourgoulhon (LOL that name) covers so much more.

I definitely agree with you 100% on Schutz. And yeah, the name is pretty funny to say lol. I mean I'm probably butchering the pronounciation but to me it sounds like "goor ghoul own". I've had 4 years of French and I still can't pronounce these names xP
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
243
Views
56K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top