Special Relativity: Bullets on a train

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in special relativity involving a train moving at speed v and bullets fired at speed u relative to the train. Participants are exploring the relationship between the timing of bullet firings and their positions in different reference frames, specifically the ground frame and the train frame.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply Lorentz transformations to relate time and distance between events in different frames. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the variables involved, particularly regarding the distance between events in the train frame and how to account for time dilation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on simplifying the problem by focusing on the ground frame and using the velocity addition formula. Others are questioning the assumptions made about the distances and times involved, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of time dilation and the proper application of the Lorentz transformation in this context. Participants are also considering the constraints imposed by the problem's setup and the definitions of the variables used.

six7th
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A train moves at speed v. Bullets are successively fired at speed u (relative to the train) from the back of the train to the front. A new bullet is fired at the instant (as measured in the train frame) the previous bullet hits the front. In the frame of the ground, what fraction of the way along the train is a given bullet, at the instant (as measured in the ground frame) the next bullet is fired? What is the maximum number of bullets that are in flight at a given instant, in the ground frame?

Homework Equations



Δt = γ(Δt' + vΔx'/c^2)
u = (u'+v)/(1+u'v/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



In the ground frame, the time elapsed between the bullet being fired and hitting the front is given by the Lorentz transformation:

Δt = γ(Δt' + vΔx'/c^2)

If the train has proper length l', then in the train frame Δt' = l'/u' and Δx'=l', so this gives:

Δt = γ(l'/u' + vl'/c^2)

So in the ground frame, the next bullet is fired at Δt. The distance traveled by a bullet in this time in the ground frame is therefore uΔt.

Using u = (u'+v)/(1+u'v/c^2) and Δt = γ(l'/u' + vl'/c^2)

Distance = (u'+v)/(1+u'v/c^2)*γ(l'/u' + vl'/c^2)

Now when I multiply this out I just get a huge mess that doesn't simplify into anything useful, so I feel like I'm doing this completely wrong. Could anyone give me any guidance?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference between "time between shots in the train frame" and "time between shots in the ground frame" is just γΔt'. There is no additional term in the transformation, as the shooter does not move in the frame of the train - just time dilation.
You'll need the speed of the bullet in the ground frame, afterwards you can calculate everything in the ground frame and you don't have to care about relativity any more.
 
It's my understanding that Δx' is the distance between events in the train frame which is surely l', meaning the transformation is not simply γΔt'?
 
The shots always happen in the same position in the frame of the train.
 
Ok I see that this is true if the two events are one shot being fired and another being fired. So I now have:

Δt = γΔt' = γ\frac{l'}{u'}

The distance traveled by a bullet in the ground frame is therefore:

uΔt = uγ\frac{l'}{u'}

Using the velocity addition formula this gives

uΔt = \frac{v+u'}{1+\frac{uv}{c^2}}\frac{\gamma l'}{u'}

Now in the ground frame the train also travels vΔt, so subtracting this from uΔt will give us the actual distance of the bullet traveled in the ground frame. This gives:

\gamma^2 l\frac{v+u'}{u'+\frac{vu'^2}{c^2}} - \gamma \frac{vl'}{u'}

\gamma^2 l(\frac{v+u'}{u'+\frac{vu'^2}{c^2}} - \frac{v}{u'})

Which is much larger than l when v tends to c, which cannot be correct so I must be missing some other step.

Edit: Just realized I actually needed to simplify some more. And the \gamma^2 cancels out to give:

distance = \frac{u'^2}{u'^2+\frac{vu'^3}{c^2}}l

Which is always less than l, for all c and u.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K