Special Relativity Force and Linearization

zachzach
Messages
257
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a particle moving at close to the speed of light with v \approx c \ \hat{z}. A small oscillatory force F(t) acts on the particle. Consider F(t) to be a first order (eg. linear) perturbation which will not effect v_o, only v_1, the first order component of v. Linearize the equation of motion and find the acceleration when F(t) is perpendicular and when F(t) is parallel to v_o.

Homework Equations



\vec{F}(t) = \dfrac{d}{dt}(\gamma m \vec{v})

The Attempt at a Solution



My trouble is with linearizing the equation.

\vec{F} = m\vec{v} \dfrac{d \gamma}{dt} + m \gamma \dfrac{d\vec{v}}{dt}

Then linearize each term so:

\vec{v} \dfrac{d \gamma}{dt} = \vec{v}_o\dot{\gamma}_o + \dfrac{d}{d \vec{v}} [\vec{v}\dot{\gamma} ] \mid_{\vec{v}= {\vec{v}_o, \dot{\gamma}= \dot{\gamma_o}}}(\vec{v} - \vec{v}_o) + \dfrac{d}{d \dot{\gamma}}[\vec{v} \dot{\gamma}] \mid_{\vec{v}= {\vec{v}_o,\dot{ \gamma}= \dot{\gamma}_o}} (\dot{\gamma} - \dot{\gamma}_o) = \vec{v}_o\dot{\gamma_o} +\dot{\gamma}_o (\vec{v} - \vec{v}_o) + \vec{v}_o(\dot{\gamma} - \dot{\gamma_o})

And then do the next term similarly. Is this the correct way to linearize?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You also need to expand \gamma (and its derivative) in powers of the velocity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top