Special relativity: proof of symmetry concept

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the product of a symmetric tensor A and an antisymmetric tensor B results in zero, specifically A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0. The confusion arises when attempting to manipulate the indices of B, as changing them should introduce a sign change due to its antisymmetry. The lecturer suggests using index interchange, leading to the conclusion that A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu} equals itself with opposite signs, thus resulting in zero. Participants clarify that the summation over indices from 1 to 4 is crucial to understanding the proof. Ultimately, the key point is recognizing that the antisymmetry of B ensures the product with the symmetric A yields a net result of zero.
Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am given a symmetric tensor A, meaning A^{\mu\nu}=A^{\nu\mu} and I am given an asymmetric tensor B, meaning B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}

Now I need to show that:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0 0)

Homework Equations



We know that an asymmetric tensor can be written as:

A^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(T^{\mu\nu}-T^{\nu\mu}) 1)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have written down from the class:

We can use 1) to write:

B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\nu\mu})

Now we multiply this by A^{\mu\nu}:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\nu\mu}) 2)

Here comes the point which I am confused: the lecturer has written that we can use
\mu\leftrightarrow\nu 3) to change the indexes on 2) such as:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu})=\frac{1}{2}A^{\mu\nu}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\mu\nu})=0 4)

Right, but here is the question. I know that tensor B is antisymmetric, meaning that
B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}! How can I then use 3) to change the indexes? That should give me a change of signs in 4)

...=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu})\neq0

So... how is 0) properly shown? Have I missed some principle at 3)?

EDIT: Is it just that in 4) -B_{\nu\mu}=B_{\mu\nu} ? But that does not work either... because if I plug that in, then I still get B+B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Uku said:

Homework Statement



I am given a symmetric tensor A, meaning A^{\mu\nu}=A^{\nu\mu} and I am given an asymmetric tensor B, meaning B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}
That's an "anti-symmetric" tensor. Any tensor that is not symmetric is an "asymmetric" tensor.

Now I need to show that:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0 0)

Homework Equations



We know that an asymmetric tensor can be written as:

A^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(T^{\mu\nu}-T^{\nu\mu}) 1)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have written down from the class:

We can use 1) to write:

B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\nu\mu})

Now we multiply this by A^{\mu\nu}:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\nu\mu}) 2)

Here comes the point which I am confused: the lecturer has written that we can use
\mu\leftrightarrow\nu 3) to change the indexes on 2) such as:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu})=\frac{1}{2}A^{\mu\nu}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\mu\nu})=0 4)

Right, but here is the question. I know that tensor B is antisymmetric, meaning that
B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}! How can I then use 3) to change the indexes? That should give me a change of signs in 4)

...=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu})\neq0

So... how is 0) properly shown? Have I missed some principle at 3)?

EDIT: Is it just that in 4) -B_{\nu\mu}=B_{\mu\nu} ? But that does not work either... because if I plug that in, then I still get B+B

Do you understand that A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu} is sum[/b}? That we are summing over \mu= 1 to 4 and \nu= 1 to 4?
 
Yes I do. I figure you gave me a hint there, I'll look at the problem again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top