I Special relativity question driving me crazy....

Newton-reborn
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Lorentz transformation answers don't make sense
Hey guys. Noob here.
Question;
S frame = x,y,z,t
S' frame = x',y',z',t'
S' is moving with a speed v relative to S and t=t'=0 when origins coincide
v= 0.6c
find the coordinates of x = 4 & t = 0 in S'
When I use lorentz transformation, I get a negative t' and x' = 5. This doesn't make sense to me because t'=t=0 and reasoning tells me that x' should also be equal to 4. Please help. I appreciate any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just discovered "relativity of simultaneity". The clocks coincide at t = t' = 0 at the origin. But nowhere else.

And I'm not sure what reasoning tells you that x' = x, i.e. that there's no length contraction. But in fact the Lorentz transformation should give you length contraction, time dilation, and relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • Like
Likes Newton-reborn
Hey thanks for your response. If t=t'=0, why is it that when I use the lorentz transformation to find t' I do not get t'=0. This is what is confusing me. Thanks
 
Newton-reborn said:
Hey thanks for your response. If t=t'=0, why is it that when I use the lorentz transformation to find t' I do not get t'=0. This is what is confusing me. Thanks
##t = t' = 0## occurs only at the origin. At all other points, when ##t = 0## we have ##t' \ne 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes Newton-reborn
Newton-reborn said:
to find t' I do not get t'=0
The "absolute time", that Newton had assumed, does not exist. What you found with the LT is the "relativity of simultaneity". That is a consequence of the 2nd postulate of SR, the invariance of the speed of light under transformation from one inertial frame to another.

You can do a simple plausibility check: Please set in the LT x = c * t, in order to describe the movement of a light pulse, and then calculate x’/t’. That is the transformed speed of light, and you will get the
result: x’/t’ = c.

With the (old) Galilean transformation x’ = x - v*t and t’ = t, you would get x’/t’ = c-v.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Newton-reborn
Thanks guy. I had assumed that when the clocks were synchronized at the origin, they were also synchronized at all other points.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top