Special relativity question driving me crazy....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a question regarding the application of Lorentz transformations in special relativity, specifically addressing the coordinates in a moving frame (S') when given specific values in a stationary frame (S). The participants explore concepts such as simultaneity, length contraction, and the implications of the Lorentz transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about obtaining a negative time coordinate (t') when using the Lorentz transformation, despite expecting t' to equal zero when t is zero.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of "relativity of simultaneity," explaining that t = t' = 0 only at the origin and not at other points.
  • There is a suggestion that the reasoning behind expecting x' to equal x may be flawed, as length contraction and time dilation are inherent in the Lorentz transformation.
  • A participant emphasizes that the assumption of synchronized clocks at all points is incorrect, which leads to the confusion experienced by the original poster.
  • One participant proposes a plausibility check using the transformation of a light pulse to illustrate the invariance of the speed of light across frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of relativity of simultaneity and the implications of the Lorentz transformation, but there is disagreement regarding the expectations of time and position coordinates in different frames. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the original poster's specific confusion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that simultaneity applies universally across different points in space, which is challenged in the discussion. The mathematical steps involved in the Lorentz transformation are not fully resolved, leaving some aspects open to interpretation.

Newton-reborn
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Lorentz transformation answers don't make sense
Hey guys. Noob here.
Question;
S frame = x,y,z,t
S' frame = x',y',z',t'
S' is moving with a speed v relative to S and t=t'=0 when origins coincide
v= 0.6c
find the coordinates of x = 4 & t = 0 in S'
When I use lorentz transformation, I get a negative t' and x' = 5. This doesn't make sense to me because t'=t=0 and reasoning tells me that x' should also be equal to 4. Please help. I appreciate any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just discovered "relativity of simultaneity". The clocks coincide at t = t' = 0 at the origin. But nowhere else.

And I'm not sure what reasoning tells you that x' = x, i.e. that there's no length contraction. But in fact the Lorentz transformation should give you length contraction, time dilation, and relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Newton-reborn
Hey thanks for your response. If t=t'=0, why is it that when I use the lorentz transformation to find t' I do not get t'=0. This is what is confusing me. Thanks
 
Newton-reborn said:
Hey thanks for your response. If t=t'=0, why is it that when I use the lorentz transformation to find t' I do not get t'=0. This is what is confusing me. Thanks
##t = t' = 0## occurs only at the origin. At all other points, when ##t = 0## we have ##t' \ne 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Newton-reborn
Newton-reborn said:
to find t' I do not get t'=0
The "absolute time", that Newton had assumed, does not exist. What you found with the LT is the "relativity of simultaneity". That is a consequence of the 2nd postulate of SR, the invariance of the speed of light under transformation from one inertial frame to another.

You can do a simple plausibility check: Please set in the LT x = c * t, in order to describe the movement of a light pulse, and then calculate x’/t’. That is the transformed speed of light, and you will get the
result: x’/t’ = c.

With the (old) Galilean transformation x’ = x - v*t and t’ = t, you would get x’/t’ = c-v.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Newton-reborn
Thanks guy. I had assumed that when the clocks were synchronized at the origin, they were also synchronized at all other points.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K