Special Relativity - "Simultaneity"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time interval between two light flashes as perceived by an observer moving at 0.374c. The participant correctly applies the time dilation equation but initially mislabels the spatial interval as Δx instead of Δx'. After receiving feedback, they acknowledge the error and correct it in their calculations. The final computed time interval is 29.35 microseconds. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately labeling variables in physics equations.
FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An experimenter triggers two lights simultaneously, which produces a
large flash located at the origin of his reference frame and a small one at x = 23.8 km.
An observer, who moves with speed 0.374c in the positive x direction, also views the
flashes. What is the time interval in seconds between them, according to her (the observer)?

Homework Equations


<br /> \Delta t = \gamma (\Delta t&#039; + \frac{v \Delta x&#039;}{c^2})<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I have use the equation above and got an answer. However, if I am correct, I do not fully understand it, and the question also asks us to clearly explain each step of our solution, so would appreciate some advice/help with that. And if I am not correct then I would appreciate if someone could point out what I did wrong and any feedback.

I used the above equation, and because of the way the question is worded I assume that t' is zero, i.e. according to the experimenter there is no time between the flashes so then the above equation becomes...
<br /> \Delta t = \gamma (\frac{v \Delta x&#039;}{c^2}) \\<br /> \Delta t = \frac{c^{-2}v \Delta x&#039;}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \\<br /> \Delta t = \frac{(3 \times 10^8)^{-2}(0.347 \times 3 \times 10^8) (23800)}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(0.347 \times 3 \times 10^8)^2}{(3 \times 10^8)^2}}} = 2.935 \times 10^{-5} s = 29.35 \mu s<br />

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good, although that Δx should be a Δx'.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Looks good, although that Δx should be a Δx'.

Chet
Thanks :) Ah yes, I typed it up wrong once and then copied and pasted it through the calculation :oops:. I've gone back and changed it now :).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top