Special Relativity textbook recommendation needed for self study

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking resources for self-study in Special Relativity (SR) in preparation for an Advanced Classical Physics course. The individual is looking for textbooks that provide a strong mathematical perspective, particularly focusing on tensors and four-vectors, while assuming no prior knowledge of physical principles. "Special Relativity" by Woodhouse from the Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series is mentioned as a suitable option for those with a mathematical inclination. Additional recommendations include Woodhouse's lecture notes and his book on Analytical Dynamics. Other suggested texts for a deeper understanding of SR include "A Traveler's Guide to Spacetime" and "Spacetime Physics" (red cover edition), which are noted for their problems and full solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of solidifying understanding through problem-solving and comprehensive resources.
fa2209
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm in my second year of my degree in Physics specialising in Theoretical Physics. My second year is coming to an end now and next year we will begin a course called Advanced Classical Physics (ACP) which will introduce Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics as well as SR and electrodynamics in four-vector notation. We covered SR very briefly in first year and the course was not very well taught however it is assumed that we will be proficient in answering basic problems in SR using lorentz transformations etc. for the ACP course

I was wondering if there are any textbooks that I could use for self-study over the summer which provide a good mathematical perspective (tensors and four vectors) on SR but assume no prior knowledge of the physical principles and introduce the reader to the basics of relativity as well.

I have considered "Special Relativity" by Woodhouse from the Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Does anyone know if this would be suitable for a physicist with a strong mathematical inclination?

Thanks a lot for any help you could provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks a lot for your help. His lecture notes look like a pretty good supplement but I think I'd probably have to go out and buy the book for a full understanding. Are the problems in the book the same as those in the problem sheets?
 
To really understand what's going on behind the formulas I suggest " A traveler's guide to spacetime" and "Spacetime physics" (the red cover edition).
 
41c4c6da8da0ef0d3de32110.L._AA300_.jpg


With problems and full solutions (specifically the edition above).
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Back
Top