Spectrum of operator's exponent

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the spectrum of the exponential of a bounded operator \( A \) in a complex Hilbert space and the exponential of the spectrum of \( A \). It establishes that \( \sigma(Exp(A)) = Exp(\sigma(A)) \) is true, building on the known result that \( \sigma(P(A)) = P(\sigma(A)) \) for polynomials \( P \). The proof utilizes the series expansion of the exponential function and properties of bounded inverses, concluding that if \( \lambda \notin \sigma(Exp(A)) \), then \( \lambda \notin Exp(\sigma(A)) \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded operators in complex Hilbert spaces
  • Familiarity with operator spectra and spectral theory
  • Knowledge of the exponential function's series expansion
  • Concept of bounded inverses and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bounded operators in complex Hilbert spaces
  • Learn about spectral theory and its applications in functional analysis
  • Explore the series expansions of functions of operators, particularly the exponential function
  • Investigate the implications of bounded inverses in operator theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone studying operator theory in Hilbert spaces.

sfire
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let A be a bounded operator in complex Hilbert space. Prove that \sigma(Exp(A))=Exp(\sigma(A)).



It is known, that \sigma(P(A))=P(\sigma(A)), where P is a polynomial.
In addition, if an operator A has a bounded inverse, then for any operator B such that ||B||<1/||A^{-1}|| their sum A+B has a bounded inverse.


I managed to prove that \sigma(Exp(A))\supseteq Exp(\sigma(A)).
As
Exp(A)=I+A+\frac{A^2}{2}+\ldots,
let
P_n(x)=1+x+\cdots+\frac{x^n}{n!}
and
Q_n(x)=\frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}+\ldots.
Then ||Q_n(A)||\to 0.



Let \lambda\notin\sigma(Exp(A)). Then Exp(A)-\lambda I is invertible, and P_n(A)-\lambda I=Exp(A)-\lambda I-Q_n(A) is invertible for large n.
Moreover, P_n(A)-(\lambda+\epsilon)I is invertible for sufficiently small epsilon. So \lambda\notin Exp(\sigma(A)).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No ideas...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K