Speed of progressive waves numerical

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of progressive waves with a frequency of 300 Hz and adjacent nodes spaced 1.5 m apart. Participants clarify the correct application of the wave speed formula v = fλ, emphasizing that the distance between nodes is λ/2. One user mistakenly calculated the speed using incorrect values, while another correctly identified that the wavelength is twice the distance between nodes, leading to a speed of 900 m/s. The importance of distinguishing between wavelength and node spacing is highlighted to avoid confusion in calculations. Accurate understanding of wave properties is essential for solving such problems effectively.
lionel messi.
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement :
progressive waves of frequency 300 hz are superimposed to produce a system of stationary waves in which adjacent nodes are 1.5m apart.calculate speed of progressive waves?


2. The attempt at a solution:
should i use
1)v=f*λ=300m/s
or
2)v=f*(2λ)=900m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lionel messi. said:
1. Homework Statement :
progressive waves of frequency 300 hz are superimposed to produce a system of stationary waves in which adjacent nodes are 1.5m apart.calculate speed of progressive waves?2. The attempt at a solution:
should i use
1)v=f*λ=300m/s
or
2)v=f*(2λ)=900m/s
Be careful here.

The symbol for wavelength is pretty much always denoted as λ. And the velocity of a wave is always v = λf (where f is the frequency). This relationship wasn't used correctly in 2), given your choice of variable names.

(Not to mention that the math in 1 isn't right either; 300 x 1.5 ≠ 300)

What you should be asking yourself is "how many nodes occur in one wavelength?"

Try plotting cos x on a piece of paper. Don't forget to put the x-axis and y-axis on the plot. From one peak to the next peak of the function (one wavelength), how many times does the function cross the x-axis? :wink:
 
sorry my bad @ 1.
in 2, I've used 2λ because the distance between 2 consecutive nodes is λ/2..so used L=λ/2 or 2L=λ which results in 900 m/s..
 
lionel messi. said:
sorry my bad @ 1.
in 2, I've used 2λ because the distance between 2 consecutive nodes is λ/2..so used L=λ/2 or 2L=λ
That's good. :approve:
which results in 900 m/s..
Wait, you've determined a length. Just make sure you distinguish the difference between the wavelenth λ and the and the distance between nodes. Both are distances, but they are different distances.

Once you've determined λ, v = fλ still applies. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top