Trouble with Two Physics Problems: Speed of Sound and Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two physics problems involving the speed of sound and acceleration. For the first problem, the height of a cliff is calculated using the time it takes for a rock to fall and the sound to travel back, leading to the equation involving both gravitational acceleration and sound speed. The second problem focuses on a motorist's speed and a cop's acceleration, requiring the use of kinematic equations to determine the time it takes for the cop to catch up. Participants emphasize the importance of isolating known variables and using consistent units in calculations. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving these problems, particularly in managing multiple unknowns and correctly applying kinematic formulas.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
I'm reviewing for a test on everything I learned last year and I'm having trouble with these two questions:

1. A rock is dropped from a sea cliff and the sound is heard 3.4s later. Speed of sound is 340 m/s, how high is the cliff?

2. A motorist passes a cop at 120 km/h. The cop begins immediately accelerating at 10 km/h/s. How much time will it take to catch the speeder and how fast will the officer be travelling?

I can't get my equations right so I have to many unknowns... the sad thing is I've seen both of these questions before... :\
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:
...

I can't get my equations right so I have to many unknowns... the sad thing is I've seen both of these questions before... :\

Isolate the known constants and unknown variables. What types of constants are present in the first question (time for something to go a certain distance, distance after uniform velocity, distance after uniform acceleration, etc.)? What is the unknown ? What kinematics equation(s) have only these types of variables present ?
 
Last edited:
1) As the rock is falling downward, it's height is given by h(t)= -4.9t2+ h0 where x0 is the height of the cliff. How long will it take to hit the bottom, as a function of h? Of course, the sound takes time vs/h (vs is the speed of sound (340 m/s) and h is the (unknown) height of the cliff) to come back to your ear. The sum of those two formulas is, according to this problem, 3.4 sec. Solve for h.

1) The distance moved by the motorist, in miles where t is in hours, is sm(t)= 120 t. The distance moved by the policeman is sp(t)= (1/2)(10 km/h/s) t2. Set those equal and solve for t. You might want to change "10 km/h/s to km/h2 to keep everything in the same units.
 
HallsofIvy said:
1) As the rock is falling downward, it's height is given by h(t)= -4.9t2+ h0 where x0 is the height of the cliff. How long will it take to hit the bottom, as a function of h? Of course, the sound takes time vs/h (vs is the speed of sound (340 m/s) and h is the (unknown) height of the cliff) to come back to your ear. The sum of those two formulas is, according to this problem, 3.4 sec. Solve for h.

1) The distance moved by the motorist, in miles where t is in hours, is sm(t)= 120 t. The distance moved by the policeman is sp(t)= (1/2)(10 km/h/s) t2. Set those equal and solve for t. You might want to change "10 km/h/s to km/h2 to keep everything in the same units.


I'm probably just tired and this isn't making sense to me, but wouldn't the time the sound takes to reach your ear be h/vs?

h(t) = 0 = -4.9t2 + h0

...solve for t and then add (as HallsofIvy said).

Edit: I don't know why my superscript isn't working, but you get the point :smile:
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm tired as well, but for #1 do I end up with \sqrt{\frac{h}{-4.9} }+ \frac{h}{340} = 3.4

When I try to do this I get some crazy quadratic... at least I see I was on track.

Thanks for your help.
 
cscott said:
Maybe I'm tired as well, but for #1 do I end up with \sqrt{\frac{h}{-4.9} }+ \frac{h}{340} = 3.4

When I try to do this I get some crazy quadratic... at least I see I was on track.

Thanks for your help.

That should be 4.9 (not -4.9).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top