Speed of Sound & Density/Temp Relationship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the speed of sound, density, and temperature in a medium. The speed of sound can be expressed using the equation s = √(E/D), where E is elasticity and D is density. It is noted that for air, elasticity is approximately 1.41 times the pressure, and since pressure and density are correlated, barometric pressure does not affect the speed of sound. The speed of sound varies with temperature, specifically following the relationship S1/S2 = √(T1/T2), indicating that sound travels faster in warmer air. The example provided shows that sound travels at approximately 770 mph at room temperature (22°C) compared to 741 mph at 0°C.
Quasaire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have an equation that gives the speed of sound in respect to the density and temperature of the medium in which the sound wave is propagating? I know the speed of sound in average temperature air molecules is like 700mph (I think).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of sound is equal to

s= [squ](E/D)

where E is the elasticity(Young's modulus) and D is the density.

For air, E = 1.41P (approx.)

Since pressure and density go hand in hand, barometric pressure does not effect the speed of sound.

Density varies inversely by temp(Kelvin), so the speed of sound varies by the squareroot of temp.

thus : S1/S2 = [squ](T1/T2)

Sound travels through air at 332 m/s (741mph) at 0°C (273°K) so at room temp 22°C (295°K), it would travel at

S2 = 741/[squ](273/295) = 770 mph

Etc.
 
Originally posted by Janus
Since pressure and density go hand in hand, barometric pressure does not effect the speed of sound.
This one always confused me, so let me expand. Hell, my understanding may even be wrong, but it makes sense to me :wink:. Sound waves propagate by air molecules bouncing off of each other. Since the speed an air molecule travels is determined by temperature (and its mass of course), that's what determines the speed of sound. In air less dense, each individual molecule will travel further than in more dense air, but the speed it travels before hitting the next molecule is unchanged.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top