Spherical tensor operators' commutation with lowering/raising operator

cattlecattle
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm studying Shankar's book (2nd edition), and I came across his equation (15.3.11) about spherical tensor operators:
[J_\pm, T_k^q]=\pm \hbar\sqrt{(k\mp q)(k\pm q+1)}T_k^{q\pm 1}

I tried to derive this using his hint from Ex 15.3.2, but the result I got doesn't have the overall \pm sign on the RHS (i.e., it's always +\hbar on the RHS). And I think my result agrees with the result of k=1 where T_1^\pm=\mp\frac{V_x\pm iV_y}{\sqrt{2}},T_1^0=V_z as well.

So I thought this was simply a typo from Shankar's book, but it seems all erratas of this book don't list this as a typo. And the wikipedia article and various other online tutorials all agree with Shankar.

However, Sakurai's book agrees with me (second edition, Eq 3.11.25b)

I'm wondering which version is correct, or could it be that the two versions are adopting different conventions. I'm leaning towards the belief that Shankar's version is a typo and all the online tutorials and the wikipedia article are simply copying the same typo.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My references (Edmonds and Messiah) agree with you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top