Spinning conducting disk in magnetic field

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to find the time taken for the disk to slow down from ω0 to (1/2)ω0...Here's what I've done:


30j7091.png


Since on each side of the disk there is current flowing into the centre, each side experiences a force F, so the net torque on the system = 2Fa. Then I can find the angular acceleration α from that...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there some electron source/drain connected to the disk?

##\alpha = \frac{d\omega}{dt}=-k\omega##
This gives an exponential decay of ω...
 
mfb said:
Is there some electron source/drain connected to the disk?

##\alpha = \frac{d\omega}{dt}=-k\omega##
This gives an exponential decay of ω...

hmmm not that I know of, but when i apply the left-hand rule to moving electrons on both sides i end up with current moving towards the centre!

The exponential decay is sort of expected, since the force depends on speed of the disk. The faster the disc is spinning, the higher emf induced and higher current and higher force..
 
i sorted it out, thanks!
 
unscientific said:
hmmm not that I know of, but when i apply the left-hand rule to moving electrons on both sides i end up with current moving towards the centre!
Sure, but without external connections, the center would acquire a negative charge, and the resulting field would cancel the magnetic force quickly.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top