Spring and gravitational energies (Simple harmonic motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the combined spring and gravitational energy for a mass m attached to a spring with force constant k. The initial equation presented is U = 1/2 k(h+y)² - mg((h/2) + y), leading to confusion about the origin of the terms and the factor of 1/2. Participants emphasize that potential energies are relative and suggest that the equilibrium position is where the spring force equals gravitational force, leading to the relationship kh = mg. To clarify the derivation, sketching the system and analyzing the energies involved is recommended. The debate highlights the importance of understanding the reference points for gravitational potential energy in the problem setup.
ichivictus
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show that the combined spring energy and gravitational energy for a mass m hanging from a light spring of force constant k can be expressed as 1/2 ky2, where y is the distance above or below the equilibrium position.

Figure shows a block connected to spring, where equilibrium is, and where the spring's unstretched position is. The distance from unstretched position to equilibrium is defined as h. From equilibirum to mass is y.


The answer starts off as

U = 1/2 k(h+y)2 - mg((h/2) +y)

From there it says mg=kh and substitutes for mg then solves.

I'm confused how U equals all that. I get how potential energy of a spring is 1/2 kx^2 for a spring or mgh in other cases, but this is quite confusing.

Then where did the 1/2 from h/2 come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer I can think of is that all energy is relative. So if the datum is conveniently chosen so that some variables drop out then that is still valid.

As an alternate approach, why don't you assume a datum distance of "d" and assume the two terms can be set to ky^2. Then solve for d.
 
The potential energies are relative - but the position the values are relative to is provided as part of the problem setup.
(Well - sort of...)

The idea is that the equilibrium position is defined to be where the force of gravity is the same as the force of the spring ... since gravity is a constant, and the spring is extended by length h, this means: kh=mg

To understand the original equation, first sketch out what they are describing and then work out the energies, and add them up.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The potential energies are relative - but the position the values are relative to is provided as part of the problem setup.
Nonsense. The gravitational potential energy datum is not given at all in the set up.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top