Spring Constant of a Spring in a Shock Absorber?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the spring constant of a spring in a shock absorber, with a proposed value of 288 N/m being questioned for accuracy. It is confirmed that the units for spring stiffness are correct. Additionally, when graphing the relationship between extension (x-axis) and elastic force (y-axis), the line of best fit should ideally pass through the origin, as both force and extension equal zero at that point. This ensures an accurate representation of Hooke's Law. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper graphing techniques in physics.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the spring constant of a spring in a shock absorber? Also, does a spring constant of 288 N/m sound right for a regular spring such as the one attached?
 

Attachments

  • 1294139287cOR488.jpg
    1294139287cOR488.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 762
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't seem to edit my post. If possible, I'll also need a citation or URL.
 
Also, one more thing (sorry :[), if I were to draw a graph of the relationship between the x value (on the x-axis), and the elastic force (on the y-axis) of a spring, and I was needed to draw a line of best fit, would it be more accurate to make sure the line of best fit passes through the origin? When x = 0, the force is also equal to 0.
 
If x means extension then x =0 usually means F =0.
So you should make the line pass through 0,0
You have the correct units for spring stiffness.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top