Calculate Maximum Spring Compression: 0.4 kg Object, 80 N/m Constant

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the maximum compression of a spring when a 0.4 kg object traveling at 8 m/s strikes it, the kinetic energy formula (Ek = 0.5 * k * x^2) should be used rather than Hooke's law. The initial kinetic energy of the object can be converted into potential energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. Using the values provided, the kinetic energy is 12.8 J, which can be equated to the potential energy in the spring to find the compression distance. The spring constant (80 N/m) plays a crucial role in determining how far the spring compresses. Ultimately, energy conservation principles guide the solution to this problem.
cooney88
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Q. An object of mass o.4kg slides at 8m/s across a frictionless path before striking one end of a spring that is fixed at the other end. the spring constant is 80N/m. the maximum distance, in metres, by which the spring compressed is : ans?




I a not sure wether to use hookes law (f=ks) or the kinetic energy formula Ek = .5kmv^2

when i used hookes law i got an answer of 0.04 but when i use the kinetic energy forumla i got 0.57. I know it doesn't really make any sense to use hookes law as u can't find the force, only the momentum (0.4x 8)

any help with this would be greatly apreciated



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you're answering your own question. :wink:
 
so its the kinetic formula cos it wouldn't make sense to use the hookes law right? but since when can u have the spring constant in a kinetic energy formula?
 
cooney88 said:
so its the kinetic formula cos it wouldn't make sense to use the hookes law right?
Yes, you'll need to use energy conservation.
but since when can u have the spring constant in a kinetic energy formula?
Consider the potential energy stored in a compressed spring--that's where the spring constant appears.
 
cheers buddy
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top