Spring-Mass System: Treating 2 Identical Springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter colonel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
In a spring-mass system with two identical springs, the treatment depends on their arrangement. When springs are in series, the effective spring constant is halved, leading to the formula K = k/2. In contrast, when springs are arranged in parallel, their spring constants add up, resulting in an effective spring constant of K = 2k. The discussion also touches on the relationship between force and displacement in both configurations, emphasizing that the force exerted by the combined spring system is influenced by the individual spring constants. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the behavior of spring systems in various setups.
colonel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, in a simple spring-mass system consisting of two identical springs, how would you treat the springs? Would Hookes equation be F = kx + kx?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are they in series or parallel?
 
Tides point is that if you attach two identical springs end to end, effectively you still have just one spring (of twice the length) still with spring constant k.

If you have two identical springs side by side (and both attached to the mass) then the act identically and then you can add them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Tides point is that if you attach two identical springs end to end, effectively you still have just one spring (of twice the length) still with spring constant k.

If you have two identical springs side by side (and both attached to the mass) then the act identically and then you can add them.

Exactly - except - the spring constant of a spring varies inversely with its length! This means that placing two identical springs in series you now have a single spring with half the effective spring constant.

To see this, consider two spring with constants k_1 and k_2. Since the springs exert identical forces on each other we have k_1 \Delta x_1 = k_2 \Delta x_2 where the \Delta's measure the compression or expansion of each spring. Also, \Delta x_1 + \Delta x_2 = x the displacement of the combined spring.

The force exerted by the combined spring is -k_2 \Delta x_2 and using the relations above you can see that F = - \frac {k_1 k_2}{k_1+k_2} x
 
Let us hang a mass M from spring 1: so, k1 x1=Mg.
Let us hang a mass M from spring 2: so, k2 x2=Mg.

If we hang the mass M from the springs arranged in series,
we have an effective spring with spring constant K and displacement X=x1+x2.
Since KX=Mg, we find
x1 = KX/k1 and
x2 = KX/k2.

By adding,
X=x1+x2=KX(1/k1 + 1/k2)
or
K=(1/k1 + 1/k2)-1

When k1=k=k2, we have K=k/2.

Edit:
Here's a quick proof using force and energy (instead of displacement).
k1 x12/2+k2 x22/2=KX2/2.
That is,
(k1 x1)2/k1+(k2 x2)2/k2=(KX)2/K.
Since KX=k1 x1=k2 x2 for springs in series,
(1/k1+1/k2)=1/K.
 
Last edited:
robphy said:
Let us hang a mass M from spring 1: so, k1 x1=Mg.
Let us hang a mass M from spring 2: so, k2 x2=Mg.

If we hang the mass M from the springs arranged in series,
we have an effective spring with spring constant K and displacement X=x1+x2.
Since KX=Mg, we find
x1 = KX/k1 and
x2 = KX/k2.
What if the springs aren't hanging but are placed horizontally?

Why is this: "The force exerted by the combined spring is -k_2 \Delta x_2" ? Wouldn't the other spring also play a role?
 
Back
Top