Springs in series and parallel : Problem for U

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a question regarding the compression of two identical springs when subjected to a force in series versus parallel. The original answer given was 2.5 cm for the parallel configuration, which was confirmed as correct by other participants. The logic explained includes that in series, each spring compresses by 5 cm under a 5 kg force, while in parallel, the force is divided, resulting in 2.5 kg per spring, leading to a 2.5 cm compression. There was a clarification needed regarding the units of force, as one participant mistakenly referred to force in Newtons instead of kilograms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct spring constants and units in such calculations.
sss_1981
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I came across an objective question on the topic 'Springs in series and parallel' .. Have i asnwered it correctly?

Q. A Force of 5Kg compresses 2 springs in series by 10 cm. What will be the compression when the same force acts on the same 2 springs but when the springs are in parallel?

Choices >>
1) 5 cm
2) 10 cm
3) 2.5 cm
4) 20 cm

MY ANSWER >> 2.5 cm

Please correct me if I am wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct !
though it should have been mentioned that the springs are identical but as nothing is mentioned we can take them to be identical
 
Thanks buddy...

Oh yes, U r spot on.. I forgot to mention that the springs are identical..

The logic I followed was >>

In series,
* The compression is 10 cm
* This means each spring compresses by 5cm
* Since the springs are in series, both the springs experience the full 5 kg
force
* So, each spring compresses 1 cm for 1 kg (Spring constant=1)

In parallel,
* Now, the force is divided between the 2 springs
* So, force acting on each spring is 2.5 N
* So, in this case, the spring compresses to 2.5xSpring constant(1) = 2.5 cm

Hope I am right with my logic too.. Sorry, I should have mentioned this earlier:biggrin:
 
most welcome

well...your logic seems correct but some problem in units.

u say spring constant is 1??
if its 1 it must be 1 cm/kg wt but in si it will be not be so

but later you say the force on each spring is 2.5 N it can't be its 2.5kg wt

otherwise your soln is correct

n btw ...
if you are preparing for some objective type examinatiom
then you can use
for series
1/k=1/k1+1/k2
and parallel
k=k1+k2
where k is equivalent spring constant
 
Thanx chap..:approve:

(Ooops, the 2nd force that I mentioned is 2.5 KG (Not Newton) ... by mistake I wrote it as 2.5N)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top