Stability of the Classical Rutherford Atom: A Hydrogen Example

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of the classical Rutherford atom, particularly in the context of a hydrogen atom. It highlights that the issue is not how much energy the electron needs to gain, but rather how much energy must be continuously supplied to counteract the energy lost through radiation. Participants suggest using equations related to electrical attraction and orbital velocity to analyze the situation. The Larmor formula is referenced as a means to calculate the energy of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the accelerating electron. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in achieving stability in the classical atomic model.
lufc88
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I know there are other things that fail about the rutherford atom
but as the electron is accelerating and radiating away energy it would fall into the nucleus, my question is how much energy would the electron need to gain so that the classical atom could be stable
a hydrogen atom for example
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lufc88 said:
I know there are other things that fail about the rutherford atom
but as the electron is accelerating and radiating away energy it would fall into the nucleus, my question is how much energy would the electron need to gain so that the classical atom could be stable
a hydrogen atom for example

It's not a question of how much energy the electron must gain, it's a question of how much energy must be supplied per second to make up for the energy radiated away.

You can calculate this for yourself. Use the equation for electrical attraction between two charged particles to calculate the force between electron and nucleus; use this force to calculate the necessary orbital velocity of the electron; then assume that the electron is radiating electromagnetic radiation with a frequency equal to its orbital period and amplitude equal to the diameter of its orbit.
 
what equation is the energy of the em wave one that includes frequency and amplitude?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top