Standard change of enthelpy, hess's law question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving Hess's Law and the standard change of enthalpy. The user attempted to manipulate the reaction equations by multiplying the hydrogen and oxygen reaction by three and combining it with another equation involving hydrazine and ammonia. They successfully matched water and oxygen but are struggling to align the nitrogen components. The user seeks guidance on whether to divide the equations by four to achieve the necessary balance. Assistance is requested to clarify the manipulation of the equations for proper alignment.
gurpalc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/lb0HL

Homework Equations



in pic

The Attempt at a Solution



So I multiplied the H2 + 1/2O2 equation by 3 and added it to the (N2H4, 2NH3) equation.

I got H2O to match up and O2 to match up, but I don't know how to manipulate the other

equations to get 4N2 to match up. Do I divide all by four? I don't know.
Please help.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please copy and paste the question -- do not link it; I have no way of knowing whether it is a scam link.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top