Star collapse in general relativity — pressure as a function of star radius

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on using the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations to determine the pressure as a function of radius in a star with constant energy density. A user expresses uncertainty about their derived equation for pressure and seeks assistance in finding the correct formulation. It is noted that the TOV equations require gravitational equilibrium and a barotropic equation of state to solve the coupled system of equations for mass and pressure. The conversation emphasizes the need to define the relationship between pressure and density, as well as the initial conditions for mass. Understanding these elements is crucial for accurately modeling star collapse in general relativity.
Lilian Sa
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
How can I find the pressure as a function of the radius of a star that have a constant energy density, spherical symmetric, its initial radius is R and the total mass is M?
Relevant Equations
TOV equations.
##ds^2=-e^{\nu(r)}dt^2+r^{\lambda(r)}dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2##
What I've done is using the TOV equations and I what I found at the end is:
##e^{[\frac{-8}{3}\pi G\rho]r^2+[\frac{16}{9}(G\pi\rho)^{2}]r^4}-\rho=P(r)##
so I am sure that this is not right, if someone can help me knowing it I really apricate it :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lilian Sa said:
How can I find the pressure as a function of the radius of a star that have a constant energy density, spherical symmetric, its initial radius is R and the total mass is M?
I haven't worked this through. The TOV equations require gravitational equilibrium, so I presume that's what you're interested and not the actual collapse (which I have no idea how to deal with)? You'd need a barotropic equation of state ##p = p(\rho)##; does the problem statement supply one? Then you solve the coupled system\begin{align*}

\frac{dm}{dr} &= 4\pi r^2 \rho \\

\frac{dp}{dr} &= \frac{-(p+\rho)(m + 4\pi r^3 p)}{r(r-2m)}

\end{align*}in ##m(r)## and ##p(r)##. You can set ##m(0) = 0##
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...