Static Equilibrium and a beam

  • Thread starter benny1993
  • Start date
  • #1
benny1993
7
0
I have been trying to work on this problem, but I keep getting the answer wrong. I would appreciate if someone could help me understand what I did wrong.
problem 7.png

Below is my answer and solution:
Problem_7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Solution_7.jpg
    Solution_7.jpg
    168.4 KB · Views: 216
  • Problem_7.jpg
    Problem_7.jpg
    181.9 KB · Views: 206
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,180
4,202
How can you work with ft and lb and come up with a force in N ?

What is the direction of Fp ? You seem to think it's horizontal. Why ?
 
  • #3
benny1993
7
0
It's actually in lbs. I don't know why I wrote 45.2N. The answer is supposed to be in lbs.
And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium while remaining horizontally.
 
  • #5
benny1993
7
0
Why not just write the moment balance simply as $$(120)(6)=T_y(12)$$
Wouldn't the answer still be the same?
 
  • #6
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,180
4,202
I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium
Assumption is unfounded.
 
  • #7
benny1993
7
0
Assumption is unfounded.
Then what would be the correct answer?
 
  • #8
22,220
5,120
Wouldn't the answer still be the same?
Yes, but wouldn’t be simpler? This would also allow you to immediately determine the vertical reaction force component at the pin.
 
  • #9
jack action
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,579
5,265
But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question is what is the magnitude of the force, not what is the horizontal component of the force.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
38,771
8,173
But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question is what is the magnitude of the force, not what is the horizontal component of the force.
Not exactly. The 75lb found in post #1 is for the tension in the cable. However, there is a neat way of seeing that the reaction at the hinge must have the same magnitude.
And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal
Easily falsified. Consider moments about the tip of the beam.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller

Suggested for: Static Equilibrium and a beam

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
228
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
571
Replies
24
Views
514
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
257
Replies
10
Views
103
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
588
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
379
Replies
12
Views
426
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
698
Top