- #1

- 7

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter benny1993
- Start date

- #1

- 7

- 0

- #2

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 14,448

- 3,737

What is the direction of F

- #3

- 7

- 0

And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium while remaining horizontally.

- #4

Chestermiller

Mentor

- 21,272

- 4,723

Why not just write the moment balance simply as $$(120)(6)=T_y(12)$$

- #5

- 7

- 0

Wouldn't the answer still be the same?Why not just write the moment balance simply as $$(120)(6)=T_y(12)$$

- #6

BvU

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 14,448

- 3,737

Assumption is unfounded.I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium

- #7

- #8

Chestermiller

Mentor

- 21,272

- 4,723

Yes, but wouldn’t be simpler? This would also allow you to immediately determine the vertical reaction force component at the pin.Wouldn't the answer still be the same?

- #9

- 2,171

- 3,553

But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question is*what is the magnitude of the force*, not *what is the horizontal component of the force*.

The question is

Last edited:

- #10

- 36,405

- 6,938

Not exactly. The 75lb found in post #1 is for the tension in the cable. However, there is a neat way of seeing that the reaction at the hinge must have the same magnitude.But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question iswhat is the magnitude of the force, notwhat is the horizontal component of the force.

Easily falsified. Consider moments about the tip of the beam.And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal

Share: