Static Equilibrium (beginner level)

AI Thread Summary
Three forces are applied to stabilize a tree sapling, with two known forces of 310 N and 425 N at an angle of 110 degrees apart. The solution involves breaking down these forces into their horizontal and vertical components to achieve static equilibrium, where the sum of forces equals zero. The correct third force, F3, is calculated to be approximately 430 N at an angle of 248 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of vector components in solving equilibrium problems. Understanding the balance of forces is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
Oscar Wilde
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three forces are applied to a tree sapling to stabilize it. F1= 310 N and F2= 425 N
The forces are 110 degrees apart, solve for the magnitude and direction of the third force applied


Homework Equations


perhaps law of sine/cosine , this is really just solving for vector quantities


The Attempt at a Solution


I drew it with the first force parallel with the x axis, and the second force making a 70 degrees angle with the horizontal. I then solved for the "vertical" force exerted, and it came out to ~400N, which would equal the stabilizing force, but this is wrong because the answer is 430N. All help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The desired result is that you want Σ F = 0.

I find it clearer to just add up the i,j components

F1 + F2 + F3 = 0

So you are looking for an F3 that = -1 * (F1 + F2)

Where F1 = 310 i + 0 j

... and so on.
 
I think you only balanced the vertical force that remained unbalanced and neglected the remaining horizontal imbalance.

You have 310 N pulling at 0 degrees and 425 N pulling at 110 degrees. You need to break this one down into its components so you can add it to the other force. You correctly found that this 425 N force has a vertical component of 400 N, however it also has a horizontal component of about 165 N, pointing in the opposite direction of the 310 N force.

So you are correct that your force needs a vertical component of 400 N pointing down to balance the 400 N component pointing up. Now you need to find the horizontal component. You have 310 pointing to the right at 0 degrees and 165 pointing to the left at 180 degrees. This results in 145 N pointing towards the right at 0 degrees.

So your force needs 400 N pointing down at 270 degrees and 145 N pointing to the left at 180 degrees. The magnitude of this force is F = (4002 + 1452)1/2 and the direction can be found by the tangent between the magnitudes of these two components.

These problems are really easy if you just remember to break vectors down into their components and then combining them. You can only add vectors that point in the same direction, that's why you got to break em down.
 
LowlyPion said:
The desired result is that you want Σ F = 0.

I find it clearer to just add up the i,j components

F1 + F2 + F3 = 0

So you are looking for an F3 that = -1 * (F1 + F2)

Where F1 = 310 i + 0 j

... and so on.


it's become a little clearer. I get F3= -1 * (310 i + 399 j+145 i)= -(455 i + 399 j)

I'm still unclear as to where to take these numbers, it does appear as though I will get 430 as a value if I plug these numbers into the pythagorean theorem, or triangulate them otherwise.
 
Oscar Wilde said:
it's become a little clearer. I get F3= -1 * (310 i + 399 j+145 i)= -(455 i + 399 j)

I'm still unclear as to where to take these numbers, it does appear as though I will get 430 as a value if I plug these numbers into the pythagorean theorem, or triangulate them otherwise.

Not quite. Your i component has a positive x and the other has a negative x so your i component is really the difference.

F1 = 310 i + 0 j
F2 = -145.35 i + 399.25 j
 
The moment of comprehension! I see now

I insert my values of forces into their respective sides. I get F3= -164.65 i and -399.25 j
I calculate my third side to equal ~430 N at 248 degrees (-112 degrees from F1)

Thanks guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top