Static equillibrum problem (FBD)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jklops686
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fbd Static
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium problem involving a forearm and the forces acting on it. The forearm weighs 20.0 N, and a scale reads 70 N due to a downward force applied by a person. Participants clarify that the free body diagram (FBD) must include all forces acting on the forearm, including the upward reaction force from the scale. There is confusion about the direction of the force vectors, particularly whether the force from the hand should be represented as downward. Ultimately, understanding the correct representation of forces in the FBD is crucial for accurately calculating the tension in the triceps muscle.
jklops686
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The forearm weighs 20.0 N and has a center of gravity in the position shown in the diagram. The person is pushing DOWN on the weight scale shown in the picture. If the reading on the scale is 70 N, calculate the tension, M, in the triceps muscle.

I understand how this problem works. My question is with the FBD, and which way the force vectors are supposed to go. My intuition (like in my attachment pic) is that the hand pressing on the scale would be going down (counterclockwise negative direction). But there should also be the reaction force going up? I've talked to people and it seems the correct answer should be with the arrow going up in order to get a positive answer for M.

Homework Equations



M=0

The Attempt at a Solution



What makes sense to me:

-70(0.4)-20(.15)-M(.025)=0 So, M=-1240

What I think the answer is:

70(0.4)-20(.15)-M(.025)=0 So, M=+1000

So why won't there be a down force from the hand pushing down?
 

Attachments

  • elbow.png
    elbow.png
    15.9 KB · Views: 1,187
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jklops686! :smile:
jklops686 said:
My question is with the FBD, and which way the force vectors are supposed to go. My intuition (like in my attachment pic) is that the hand pressing on the scale would be going down (counterclockwise negative direction). But there should also be the reaction force going up? …

So why won't there be a down force from the hand pushing down?

a free body diagram must show all the forces on a body

in this case, the body is the forearm

the reaction force from the scale is a force on the forearm, so it goes on the free body diagram :wink:
 
brilliant! That's definitely good to remember. Thank you. I was thinking the hand pushing would act as a load force.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top