Static or dynamic pressures in duct

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonny6001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Static
AI Thread Summary
To maximize airflow through a duct, a higher dynamic pressure is preferred, as it increases the velocity of the flow while maintaining total pressure. A high dynamic pressure results in lower static pressure, which effectively "sucks" air through the duct. The discussion highlights the complexity of airflow dynamics, particularly when the duct is not aligned with the airflow direction. Clarification on the original question is needed for better understanding, as the topic can be challenging without visual aids. Ultimately, increasing dynamic pressure is key to optimizing airflow in duct systems.
Jonny6001
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a little question regarding airflow.

You have an object in a wind-tunnel, which has a dynamic pressure of 1000Pa and say static pressure of 99000Pa.

If the object has a duct with static and total pressure probes, to maximise airflow through that duct, would you be looking for the highest or lowest dynamic pressure?

The way I approach it is, if the dynamic pressure is high the it will cause low static pressure which has the effect of trying to "suck" air though the duct. So a high dynamic pressure in the duct will maximize airflow. Do you guys agree with this?

Just as an aside, the duct is not exactly in-line with the air flow direction.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
ping @Chestermiller . Help needed, spring cleaning.
Sorry. I really don't understand what this member is asking. Maybe @boneh3ad can help.
 
1) This is from February 2010, so... um...

2) This is incredibly hard to parse without some kind of drawing or at least a better written description.

3) The short answer is that for any duct, for a given total pressure, incompressible air flow will be maximized when you raise the dynamic pressure because, literally, that amounts to raising the velocity of the flow. I have no idea how this relates to the broader question.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes anorlunda and Chestermiller
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top