Statics question - change in loading

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJBladester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a statics problem involving a beam with various loads and supports. The main issue is calculating the necessary moment at point F to maintain the reaction at point E after certain loads are removed and a new force is added. Participants analyze the moments around points B and F, with conflicting calculations leading to different conclusions about the required moment. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the moment needed at point F is approximately 12,000 N·m clockwise, despite initial disagreements on the calculations. The importance of free body diagrams in verifying answers is also emphasized, especially for exam preparation.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



In the structure shown, the beam is pinned at point B. Point E is a roller support. The beam is loaded with a distributed load from point A to point B of 400 N/m, a 500 N·m couple at point C, and a vertical 900 N force at point D. If the distributed load and the vertical load at D are removed, and a vertically upward force of 1700 N at point F is added, what moment at point F would be necessary to keep the reaction at point E the same?

Homework Equations



001.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the reaction Ey at point E is to be unchanged, we only need to calculate the change in loading. Also, the location of the new moment is irrelevant.

Since the reaction forces at B are unknown, it is convenient to find the change in loading by summing the moments at point B.

The distributed 400 N/m force creates an 800 N downward force 1m to the left of point B.

The changes at point B needed to counteract the removal of the 800 N force and the 900 N force, and the addition of an upward force at point F are:

∑MB = (800N)(1m) - (900N)(5.5m) + (1700N)(4.5m) = 3,500N clockwise

That's my answer, but the book has:

-(800N)(1m) + (900N)(5.5m) + (1700N)(4.5m) = 11,800N clockwise

I've stared at this problem for an hour now and I can't see how my calculation is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I haven't written this out, but it looks like if you leave the diagram as is, and then apply ##\sum M_B = 0##, that should get you ##E_y##.

##\sum F_x = 0 \Rightarrow ?##
##\sum F_y = 0 \Rightarrow ?##

Should give you the rest.

Place the new force at ##F##. Apply your equilibrium equations again, what do you get?
 
Hello Zondrina,

Assuming clockwise moments, y-axis up and x-axis to the right...

From the original diagram,

\Sigma M_B=-(800N)(1m)-(500N\cdot m)+(900N)(5.5m)-(E_y)(7m)=0
E_y=\frac{-(800N)(1m)-(500N\cdot m)+(900N)(5.5m)}{(7m)}=521N

No need to calculate the sum of the forces in the x direction.

With the distributed load and load at point D removed, and with the new 1,700 N force at point F:

\sum M_F=(B_y)(4.5m)-(500Nm)-(E_y)(2.5m)=M_F
\sum F_y=B_y+1700N+E_y=0
B_y=-521N-1700N=-2221N
\sum M_F=(-2221N)(4.5m)-(500Nm)-(521N)(2.5m)=-11797Nm\approx-12000Nm

I still think the book's answer of 12,000 N·m clockwise is incorrect. My assumption of clockwise moments throughout and the negative 12,000 N·m moment just obtained seems to suggest that the answer is truly 12,000 N·m counter-clockwise. Would you agree?

Some background: I'm studying for the FE. My strengths are in electrical engineering but I've taken statics and dynamics, physics and math, etc. I've read that one gets about 3 minutes per problem on the FE, so I need to find a way to easily spot wrong answers (test-taking tricks, if you will). Some of these statics problems easily take me 5 - 10 minutes.
 
No need to calculate the sum of the forces in the x direction.

Indeed, it is out of habit I write the equations down. Although it does inform you trivially that ##B_x = 0##.

As for the moment around ##F##. Assuming clockwise:

##\sum M_F = 0 \Rightarrow M_F - (2221N)(4.5m) - (500Nm) - (521N)(2.5m) = 0##

So ##M_F ≈ 12000 N## clockwise. This is because you were asked "what moment at point F...".

Some background: I'm studying for the FE. My strengths are in electrical engineering but I've taken statics and dynamics, physics and math, etc. I've read that one gets about 3 minutes per problem on the FE, so I need to find a way to easily spot wrong answers (test-taking tricks, if you will). Some of these statics problems easily take me 5 - 10 minutes.

I'm in electrical too. There's no better way to check your answer than to have drawn a free body diagram imo.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top