Statics question - change in loading

In summary, the homework statement is trying to find the change in moment around a point when a distributed load and a vertical force are added. The equation used to find the change in moment is ##\sum M_F = 0##. The answer given is that the moment around point F is 12,000 N·m counter-clockwise.
  • #1
JJBladester
Gold Member
286
2

Homework Statement



In the structure shown, the beam is pinned at point B. Point E is a roller support. The beam is loaded with a distributed load from point A to point B of 400 N/m, a 500 N·m couple at point C, and a vertical 900 N force at point D. If the distributed load and the vertical load at D are removed, and a vertically upward force of 1700 N at point F is added, what moment at point F would be necessary to keep the reaction at point E the same?

Homework Equations



001.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the reaction Ey at point E is to be unchanged, we only need to calculate the change in loading. Also, the location of the new moment is irrelevant.

Since the reaction forces at B are unknown, it is convenient to find the change in loading by summing the moments at point B.

The distributed 400 N/m force creates an 800 N downward force 1m to the left of point B.

The changes at point B needed to counteract the removal of the 800 N force and the 900 N force, and the addition of an upward force at point F are:

∑MB = (800N)(1m) - (900N)(5.5m) + (1700N)(4.5m) = 3,500N clockwise

That's my answer, but the book has:

-(800N)(1m) + (900N)(5.5m) + (1700N)(4.5m) = 11,800N clockwise

I've stared at this problem for an hour now and I can't see how my calculation is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hmm, I haven't written this out, but it looks like if you leave the diagram as is, and then apply ##\sum M_B = 0##, that should get you ##E_y##.

##\sum F_x = 0 \Rightarrow ?##
##\sum F_y = 0 \Rightarrow ?##

Should give you the rest.

Place the new force at ##F##. Apply your equilibrium equations again, what do you get?
 
  • #3
Hello Zondrina,

Assuming clockwise moments, y-axis up and x-axis to the right...

From the original diagram,

[tex]\Sigma M_B=-(800N)(1m)-(500N\cdot m)+(900N)(5.5m)-(E_y)(7m)=0[/tex]
[tex]E_y=\frac{-(800N)(1m)-(500N\cdot m)+(900N)(5.5m)}{(7m)}=521N[/tex]

No need to calculate the sum of the forces in the x direction.

With the distributed load and load at point D removed, and with the new 1,700 N force at point F:

[tex]\sum M_F=(B_y)(4.5m)-(500Nm)-(E_y)(2.5m)=M_F[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_y=B_y+1700N+E_y=0[/tex]
[tex]B_y=-521N-1700N=-2221N[/tex]
[tex]\sum M_F=(-2221N)(4.5m)-(500Nm)-(521N)(2.5m)=-11797Nm\approx-12000Nm[/tex]

I still think the book's answer of 12,000 N·m clockwise is incorrect. My assumption of clockwise moments throughout and the negative 12,000 N·m moment just obtained seems to suggest that the answer is truly 12,000 N·m counter-clockwise. Would you agree?

Some background: I'm studying for the FE. My strengths are in electrical engineering but I've taken statics and dynamics, physics and math, etc. I've read that one gets about 3 minutes per problem on the FE, so I need to find a way to easily spot wrong answers (test-taking tricks, if you will). Some of these statics problems easily take me 5 - 10 minutes.
 
  • #4
No need to calculate the sum of the forces in the x direction.

Indeed, it is out of habit I write the equations down. Although it does inform you trivially that ##B_x = 0##.

As for the moment around ##F##. Assuming clockwise:

##\sum M_F = 0 \Rightarrow M_F - (2221N)(4.5m) - (500Nm) - (521N)(2.5m) = 0##

So ##M_F ≈ 12000 N## clockwise. This is because you were asked "what moment at point F...".

Some background: I'm studying for the FE. My strengths are in electrical engineering but I've taken statics and dynamics, physics and math, etc. I've read that one gets about 3 minutes per problem on the FE, so I need to find a way to easily spot wrong answers (test-taking tricks, if you will). Some of these statics problems easily take me 5 - 10 minutes.

I'm in electrical too. There's no better way to check your answer than to have drawn a free body diagram imo.
 
Last edited:
  • #5


As a scientist, it is important to remember that there can be multiple correct solutions to a problem, as long as they are based on sound reasoning and use appropriate equations. In this case, both your answer and the answer given in the book appear to be correct, but they are approaching the problem from different perspectives.

Your approach is to consider the change in loading at point B, and calculate the moment needed to keep the reaction at point E the same. This is a valid approach and your calculations are correct. However, the book's approach is to calculate the moment needed at point F to balance the external forces and moments acting on the beam. Both approaches ultimately lead to the same result.

It is important to note that in real-world situations, there may be multiple ways to solve a problem and it is up to the scientist to choose the most appropriate approach based on the situation. In this case, both approaches are valid and yield the correct result.
 

Related to Statics question - change in loading

What is meant by "change in loading" in statics?

In statics, "change in loading" refers to any modification or alteration in the forces or loads acting on a structure or object. This can include changes in magnitude, direction, or location of the applied forces.

Why is it important to consider changes in loading in statics?

Changes in loading can have a significant impact on the behavior and stability of a structure. It is important to consider these changes in order to ensure the safety and integrity of the structure. Failure to account for changes in loading can result in structural failures or accidents.

What are some common factors that can cause changes in loading?

Changes in loading can be caused by various factors, such as changes in the environment (e.g. wind, temperature), changes in the usage or occupancy of a structure, or changes in the structural components themselves (e.g. deformation, damage).

How can changes in loading be analyzed in statics?

Changes in loading can be analyzed using various techniques such as free body diagrams, equilibrium equations, and structural analysis methods. Computer software programs can also be used to simulate and analyze changes in loading on a structure.

What are some potential consequences of not accounting for changes in loading in statics?

Not accounting for changes in loading can result in unexpected stresses, deformations, or failures in a structure. This can lead to costly repairs, property damage, or even injury or loss of life. It is crucial to consider and properly analyze changes in loading in order to ensure the safety and stability of a structure.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
955
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
982
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
930
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
907
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top