Statistical mechanics - Helmholtz free energy and Z

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The neutnral carbon atom has a 9-fold degeerate ground level and a 5-fold degenerate excited level at an energy 0.82 eV above the ground level. Spectroscopic measurements of a certain star show that 10% of the neutral carbon atoms are in the excited level, and that the population of higher levels is negligible. Assuming thermal equilibrium, find the temperature.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the fact that P(s) = 0.1 = ..., I have found that T = 5900 K.

Now I want to verify F = -k*T*log(Z) and P(s) = exp(-F / kt)/Z by plugging in the same values, but it doesn't make sense. This is my F:

F = - k \cdot 5900K \cdot \ln \left( Z \right) = - k \cdot 5900K \cdot \ln \left( {9 + 5 \cdot e^{\frac{{ - 0.82}}{{k \cdot 5900K}}} } \right)

I insert this is in P(s) = exp(-F/kT)/Z:

P(s) = \frac{1}{Z} \cdot \exp \left( {\frac{{ - F}}{{kT}}} \right) = \frac{1}{{9 + 5 \cdot e^{\frac{{ - 0.82}}{{k \cdot 5900K}}} }} \cdot \exp \left( {\ln \left( {9 + 5 \cdot e^{\frac{{ - 0.82}}{{k \cdot 5900K}}} } \right)} \right). I have NOT multiplied with 5 since we are using F.

I can see that it gives one, since e takes the logarithm, but still - it doesn't make sense, since it should equal 0.1. Can you see where my error is?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the problem that P(s) = \frac{1}{Z} \cdot \exp \left( {\frac{{ - F}}{{kT}}} \right) only works when I write F=E-TS and NOT F=-k\cdot T\cdot \ln(Z)?

What I do know is that there is something fundementally wrong in the way I use this expression. It would be great if you could point out my error.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top