Statistics, calculate the distribution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
MaxManus
Messages
268
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Assume [itex]z_1, ..., z_m[/itex] are iid,[itex]z_i = μ+\epsilon_i[/itex]

[itex]\epsilon_i][/itex]is N(0,σ^2)

Show that
f(z; μ) = g([itex]\bar{z}[/itex]; μ)h(z)
where h(·) is a function not depending on μ.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Now z is normal distributed with mean my and variance sigma^2

[itex]f(z,\mu) = \frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(z-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]

f(z; μ) = [itex]\prod_{i=1}^m \frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(z_i-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]

[itex]f(\bf{z},\mu) = (\frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}})^m \prod_{i=1}^m e^{-\frac{(z_i-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]

but how do I go from here to
f(z; μ) = g([itex]\bar{z}[/itex]; μ)h(z)

And am I in the right track?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MaxManus said:

Homework Statement



Assume [itex]z_1, ..., z_m[/itex] are iid,[itex]z_i = μ+\epsilon_i[/itex]

[itex]\epsilon_i][/itex]is N(0,σ^2)

Show that
f(z; μ) = g([itex]\bar{z}[/itex]; μ)h(z)
where h(·) is a function not depending on μ.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



Now z is normal distributed with mean my and variance sigma^2

[itex]f(z,\mu) = \frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(z-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]

f(z; μ) = [itex]\prod_{i=1}^m \frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(z_i-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]




[itex]f(\bf{z},\mu) (\frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}})^m \prod_{i=1}^m e^{-\frac{(z_i-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}[/itex]

but how do I go from here to
f(z; μ) = g([itex]\bar{z}[/itex]; μ)h(z)

And am I in the right track?

I assume the notation means that [itex]g(\bar{z})[/itex] is the pdf of the sample mean. If so, you need to find the function g. What properties of the normal distribution are important for doing that? What is the importance of the fact that the [itex]z_i[/itex] are independent?

RGV
 
Thanks

I'm not sure what the notation mean, but I assumed g was a function of the sample mean and mu. But if it is the pdf of the sample mean.
The pdf of [itex]\bar{z}[/itex] is the pdf to the normal distribution with mean [itex]\mu][/itex] and variance [itex]\sigma^2/m[/itex]
So
[itex]g(\bar{z}) = \frac{1}{(\sigma^2/m )\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(\bar{z}-\mu)^2}{2 (\sigma^2/m)}}[/itex]

But I'm not sure where to go from here.
 
Last edited:
MaxManus said:
Thanks

I'm not sure what the notation mean, but I assumed g was a function of the sample mean and mu. But if it is the pdf of the sample mean.
The pdf of [itex]\bar{z}[/itex] is the pdf to the normal distribution with mean [itex]\mu][/itex] and variance [itex]\sigma^2/m[/itex]
So
[itex]g(\bar{z}) = \frac{1}{(\sigma^2/m )\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(\bar{z}-\mu)^2}{2 (\sigma^2/m)}}[/itex]

But I'm not sure where to go from here.

So,
[tex]g = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma/\sqrt{n}}\exp{\left[\left(\frac{z_1+z_2+\cdots+z_n}{n}-\mu \right)^2/(2 \sigma^2 /n)\right]}.[/tex]

You are supposed to show that f(z,μ)/g does not have μ in it.

PS: your expressions for the normal distributions are a bit wrong: you should have[itex]\frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}}, \text{ not } \frac{1}{\sigma^2 \sqrt{2 \pi}}[/itex] in front.

RGV
 
Thanks for all the help.

To those who want to see the rest of the calculation it is in the attachment.
 

Attachments